Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 6 |
| Writing Evaluation | 6 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
| Writing Tests | 4 |
| Interrater Reliability | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Intermode Differences | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Allen, Nancy | 1 |
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Bennett, Randy Elliott | 1 |
| Bridgeman, Brent | 1 |
| Brown, Michelle Stallone | 1 |
| Crawford, Lindy | 1 |
| Harrison, Scott B. | 1 |
| Horkay, Nancy | 1 |
| Kaplan, Bruce | 1 |
| Midyette, Jeb | 1 |
| On-Soon Lee | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkOn-Soon Lee – Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 2024
Despite the increasing interest in using AI tools as assistant agents in instructional settings, the effectiveness of ChatGPT, the generative pretrained AI, for evaluating the accuracy of second language (L2) writing has been largely unexplored in formative assessment. Therefore, the current study aims to examine how ChatGPT, as an evaluator,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Download full textAttali, Yigal; Bridgeman, Brent; Trapani, Catherine – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2010
A generic approach in automated essay scoring produces scores that have the same meaning across all prompts, existing or new, of a writing assessment. This is accomplished by using a single set of linguistic indicators (or features), a consistent way of combining and weighting these features into essay scores, and a focus on features that are not…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Test Scoring Machines
Crawford, Lindy; Smolkowski, Keith – Assessing Writing, 2008
Students in grades 5 and 8 completed a state writing assessment, and their first and final drafts on the extended writing portion of the test were copied and scored using the state writing rubric. The rubric consisted of three primary traits: Content and Organization, Style and Fluency, and Language Use. Scorers were blind to the study purpose and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Grade 8, Grade 5
Whithaus, Carl; Harrison, Scott B.; Midyette, Jeb – Assessing Writing, 2008
This article examines the influence of keyboarding versus handwriting in a high-stakes writing assessment. Conclusions are based on data collected from a pilot project to move Old Dominion University's Exit Exam of Writing Proficiency from a handwritten format into a dual-option format (i.e., the students may choose to handwrite or keyboard the…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Handwriting, Pilot Projects, Writing Tests
Wang, Jinhao; Brown, Michelle Stallone – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
The current research was conducted to investigate the validity of automated essay scoring (AES) by comparing group mean scores assigned by an AES tool, IntelliMetric [TM] and human raters. Data collection included administering the Texas version of the WriterPlacer "Plus" test and obtaining scores assigned by IntelliMetric [TM] and by…
Descriptors: Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Comparative Testing, Intermode Differences
Horkay, Nancy; Bennett, Randy Elliott; Allen, Nancy; Kaplan, Bruce; Yan, Fred – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
This study investigated the comparability of scores for paper and computer versions of a writing test administered to eighth grade students. Two essay prompts were given on paper to a nationally representative sample as part of the 2002 main NAEP writing assessment. The same two essay prompts were subsequently administered on computer to a second…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Program Effectiveness
