Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Introductory Courses | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chang, Jane | 1 |
| Chao, Joseph T. | 1 |
| Cohen, Allan | 1 |
| Ottaway, Thomas A. | 1 |
| Parker, Kevin R. | 1 |
| Raczynski, Kevin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRaczynski, Kevin; Cohen, Allan – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
The literature on Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems has provided useful validation frameworks for any assessment that includes AES scoring. Furthermore, evidence for the scoring fidelity of AES systems is accumulating. Yet questions remain when appraising the scoring performance of AES systems. These questions include: (a) which essays are…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Test Scoring Machines, Test Validity, Evaluators
Parker, Kevin R.; Chao, Joseph T.; Ottaway, Thomas A.; Chang, Jane – Journal of Information Technology Education, 2006
The selection of a programming language for introductory courses has long been an informal process involving faculty evaluation, discussion, and consensus. As the number of faculty, students, and language options grows, this process becomes increasingly unwieldy. As it stands, the process currently lacks structure and replicability. Establishing a…
Descriptors: Programming Languages, Introductory Courses, Selection, Criteria
