Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Federal Legislation | 7 |
Test Selection | 7 |
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Student Evaluation | 4 |
Educational Assessment | 3 |
Educational Policy | 3 |
Formative Evaluation | 3 |
Guidelines | 3 |
Psychometrics | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Test Bias | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment and Accountability… | 2 |
Administration for Children &… | 1 |
Assessment for Effective… | 1 |
Education Commission of the… | 1 |
National Technical Assistance… | 1 |
Rowman & Littlefield… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Books | 1 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Adult Basic Education | 1 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Texas | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 4 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 2 |
Measures of Academic Progress | 1 |
Test of Adult Basic Education | 1 |
Wide Range Achievement Test | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sanders, Sara – National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Neglected or Delinquent Children and Youth (NDTAC), 2019
This guide is designed to assist States, agencies, and/or facilities who work with youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at-risk (N or D). The information in the guide will benefit those who are (a) interested in implementing pre-posttests, (b) in the process of identifying an appropriate pre-posttest, or (c) ready to evaluate current testing…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Delinquency, Pretests Posttests, Testing
Woods, Julie Rowland – Education Commission of the States, 2015
While federal law requires students to be tested in math, English-language arts and science in particular grades, states are still struggling to mount the resources and expertise necessary to fully implement college and career readiness standards, let alone new assessments aligned to these higher standards. New assessments are not only more…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Tests, Evaluation Methods, Test Selection
Chappell, Julia C.; Stephens, Tammy L.; Kinnison, Lloyd; Pettigrew, Johnnie D. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2009
This article summarizes the results of a study involving 42 educational diagnosticians from North Texas. The study was conducted to determine diagnosticians' perceived understanding of early literacy development and their ability to effectively choose and interpret assessments of phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and reading fluency. The…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Knowledge Level, Reading Fluency, Phonological Awareness
Halle, Tamara; Zaslow, Martha; Wessel, Julia; Moodie, Shannon; Darling-Churchill, Kristen – Administration for Children & Families, 2011
The 2007 reauthorization of Head Start requires Head Start programs to use child assessments and developmental screeners that are developmentally, linguistically, and culturally appropriate, as well as valid and reliable in the language in which they are used. This can be a challenge, since very few child assessment tools are developed or tested…
Descriptors: Preschool Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Preschool Children, Disabilities
Herman, Joan L.; Osmundson, Ellen; Dietel, Ronald – Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center, 2010
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB, 2002) has produced an explosion of interest in the use of assessment to measure and improve student learning. Initially focused on annual state tests, educators quickly learned that results came too little and too late to identify students who were falling behind. At the same time, evidence from the…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Formative Evaluation, Benchmarking, Educational Assessment
Herman, Joan L.; Osmundson, Ellen; Dietel, Ronald – Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center, 2010
This report describes the purposes of benchmark assessments and provides recommendations for selecting and using benchmark assessments--addressing validity, alignment, reliability, fairness and bias and accessibility, instructional sensitivity, utility, and reporting issues. We also present recommendations on building capacity to support schools'…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Benchmarking, Educational Assessment
Shermis, Mark D.; DiVesta, Francis J. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2011
"Classroom Assessment in Action" clarifies the multi-faceted roles of measurement and assessment and their applications in a classroom setting. Comprehensive in scope, Shermis and Di Vesta explain basic measurement concepts and show students how to interpret the results of standardized tests. From these basic concepts, the authors then…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests, Scores, Measurement