Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 3 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Predictive Measurement | 3 |
Academic Ability | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Data Collection | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Choi, Seung W. | 1 |
Dodd, Barbara G. | 1 |
Emily R. Forcht | 1 |
Ethan R. Van Norman | 1 |
Grady, Matthew W. | 1 |
Loken, Eric | 1 |
Rulison, Kelly L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ethan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2024
This study evaluated the forecasting accuracy of trend estimation methods applied to time-series data from computer adaptive tests (CATs). Data were collected roughly once a month over the course of a school year. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy of two regression-based growth estimation methods (ordinary least squares and Theil-Sen). The…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity, Predictor Variables
Choi, Seung W.; Grady, Matthew W.; Dodd, Barbara G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
The goal of the current study was to introduce a new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The predicted standard error reduction (PSER) stopping rule uses the predictive posterior variance to determine the reduction in standard error that would result from the administration of additional items. The performance of the PSER was…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods
Rulison, Kelly L.; Loken, Eric – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2009
A difficult result to interpret in Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) occurs when an ability estimate initially drops and then ascends continuously until the test ends, suggesting that the true ability may be higher than implied by the final estimate. This study explains why this asymmetry occurs and shows that early mistakes by high-ability…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Academic Ability