Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Aziz, Shamsa | 1 |
| Baartman, Liesbeth K. J. | 1 |
| Hummel, Hans G. K. | 1 |
| Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée | 1 |
| Mahmood, Munazza | 1 |
| Nadolski, Rob J. | 1 |
| Rehman, Zahra | 1 |
| Yates, Brian T. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Pakistan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textAziz, Shamsa; Mahmood, Munazza; Rehman, Zahra – Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2018
Evaluation denotes the monitoring of progress towards desired goals and objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate educational quality at schools using Stufflebeam's CIPP evaluation model (1983). The population comprised the principal, heads of each wing and teachers of various branches of a Welfare School System in Rawalpindi. Data…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Evaluation Methods, Models, Summative Evaluation
Content Validity of Game-Based Assessment: Case Study of a Serious Game for ICT Managers in Training
Direct linkHummel, Hans G. K.; Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée; Nadolski, Rob J.; Baartman, Liesbeth K. J. – Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2017
Serious games foster the acquisition of complex problem-solving skills. Assessment of such skills should be in line with instruction, and within a serious game environment its content validity should equal face-to-face assessment. Research on assessment in serious gaming has remained rather scarce. This article shows how assessment can be…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Educational Games, Computer Games, Computer Assisted Testing
Yates, Brian T. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The value of a program can be understood as referring not only to outcomes, but also to how those outcomes compare to the types and amounts of resources expended to produce the outcomes. Major potential mistakes and biases in assessing the worth of resources consumed, as well as the value of outcomes produced, are explored. Most of these occur…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Problems
