Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Cognitive Measurement | 3 |
Testing Problems | 3 |
Cognitive Ability | 2 |
Evaluation Problems | 2 |
Predictive Validity | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Attitudes | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Cognitive Science | 1 |
Cognitive Tests | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Carstensen, Claus H. | 1 |
Charles, Jennifer E. | 1 |
Glas, Cees A. W. | 1 |
Köhler, Carmen | 1 |
Makransky, Guido | 1 |
Pohl, Steffi | 1 |
Reeve, Charlie L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Köhler, Carmen; Pohl, Steffi; Carstensen, Claus H. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2017
Competence data from low-stakes educational large-scale assessment studies allow for evaluating relationships between competencies and other variables. The impact of item-level nonresponse has not been investigated with regard to statistics that determine the size of these relationships (e.g., correlations, regression coefficients). Classical…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cognitive Measurement, Testing Problems, Regression (Statistics)
Makransky, Guido; Glas, Cees A. W. – International Journal of Testing, 2013
Cognitive ability tests are widely used in organizations around the world because they have high predictive validity in selection contexts. Although these tests typically measure several subdomains, testing is usually carried out for a single subdomain at a time. This can be ineffective when the subdomains assessed are highly correlated. This…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cognitive Ability, Adaptive Testing, Feedback (Response)
Reeve, Charlie L.; Charles, Jennifer E. – Intelligence, 2008
The current study examines the views of experts in the science of mental abilities about the primacy and uniqueness of "g" and the social implications of ability testing, and compares their responses to the views of a group of non-expert psychologists. Results indicate expert consensus that "g" is an important, non-trivial determinant (or at least…
Descriptors: Race, Psychologists, Testing, Predictive Validity