Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Darragh, Amy | 2 |
| Dougherty, Megan | 2 |
| Hand, Brittany N. | 2 |
| Robek, Natalie | 2 |
| Schmidt, Elizabeth K. | 2 |
| Sommerich, Carolyn | 2 |
| Havercamp, Susan | 1 |
| Havercamp, Susan M. | 1 |
| Lifshitz, Hefziba | 1 |
| Shtein, Sarit | 1 |
| Vakil, Eli | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schmidt, Elizabeth K.; Dougherty, Megan; Robek, Natalie; Darragh, Amy; Hand, Brittany N.; Havercamp, Susan M.; Weaver, Lindy L.; Sommerich, Carolyn – American Journal of Sexuality Education, 2021
Sexuality education (SE) for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities is needed, but is sparse. Seven individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and two educators participated in a mixed method participatory design to iteratively refine nine learning activities for SE. We analyzed usability, usefulness, and…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities, Sex Education, Learning Activities
Schmidt, Elizabeth K.; Robek, Natalie; Dougherty, Megan; Hand, Brittany N.; Havercamp, Susan; Sommerich, Carolyn; Weaver, Lindy; Darragh, Amy – American Journal of Sexuality Education, 2021
Introduction: According to the World Health Organization, sexuality education (SE) is considered a human right and aims to increase understanding, decrease abuse, unplanned pregnancies, and sexually transmitted infections. Yet, individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities are less likely to receive or SE is primarily focused on…
Descriptors: Sex Education, Access to Education, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities
Lifshitz, Hefziba; Shtein, Sarit; Weiss, Izhak; Vakil, Eli – European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2011
This meta-analysis combines the effect size (ES) of 40 explicit memory experiments in populations with intellectual disability (ID). Eight meta-analyses were performed, as well as contrast tests between ES. The explicit memory of participants with ID was inferior to that of participants with typical development (TD). Relatively preserved explicit…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Mental Age, Memory, Memorization

Peer reviewed
Direct link
