Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
| Moral Development | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Values | 2 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Theories | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bebeau, Muriel J. | 1 |
| Boom, Jan | 1 |
| Brugman, Daniel | 1 |
| Narvaez, Darcia | 1 |
| Thoma, Stephen | 1 |
| Thoma, Stephen J. | 1 |
| van den Enden, Thijs | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Alabama | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkvan den Enden, Thijs; Boom, Jan; Brugman, Daniel; Thoma, Stephen – Journal of Moral Education, 2019
The Defining Issues Test (DIT) has been the dominant measure of moral development. The DIT has its roots in Kohlberg's original stage theory of moral judgment development and asks respondents to rank a set of stage typed statements in order of importance on six stories. However, the question to what extent the DIT-data match the underlying stage…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Moral Development, Moral Values, Values
Thoma, Stephen J.; Bebeau, Muriel J.; Narvaez, Darcia – Theory and Research in Education, 2016
In a 2014 paper in "Theory and Research in Education," Howard Curzer and colleagues critique the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development according to eight criteria that are described as difficulties any measure of educational outcomes must address. This article highlights how Curzer et al. do not consult existing empirical…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Moral Development, Moral Values, Values
