NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202511
Since 2016 (last 10 years)11
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gabrielle Francis; Nathaniel von der Embse; David Putwain; Eunsook Kim – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
Standardized testing is an integral part of the English and American education systems. However, the use of high-stakes testing has unintended consequences, one of which is test anxiety. Over the last 50 years, increased attention has been directed to developing tools to identify students experiencing test anxiety. However, many test anxiety…
Descriptors: Test Anxiety, Secondary School Students, Foreign Countries, Affective Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
David A. Klingbeil; Alexander D. Latham; Jessica S. Kim; Madeline C. Schmitt – Psychology in the Schools, 2025
Several researchers have called for schools to interpret universal screening results using posterior probabilities. Following this recommendation could require schools to move away from direct-route, single-measure screening unless base rates of risk fall within a narrow range. In this descriptive study, we investigated two questions surrounding…
Descriptors: Reading Skills, Mathematics Skills, Screening Tests, Test Results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee Wolff; Haydn Till; Bruce Watt – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a significant public health concern arising from prenatal alcohol exposure. This study examines the clinical utility of Wechsler intelligence tests in assessing cognition in 108 children with confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure. Data were analysed using multidimensional scaling and Guttman's Structural…
Descriptors: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Intelligence Tests, Children, Multidimensional Scaling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Philipp Sterner; Kim De Roover; David Goretzko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
When comparing relations and means of latent variables, it is important to establish measurement invariance (MI). Most methods to assess MI are based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Recently, new methods have been developed based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA); most notably, as extensions of multi-group EFA, researchers introduced…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Measurement Techniques, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kent Anderson Seidel – School Leadership Review, 2025
This paper examines one of three central diagnostic tools of the Concerns Based Adoption Model, the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ). The SoCQ was developed with a focus on K12 education. It has been used widely since developed in 1973, in early childhood, higher education, medical, business, community, and military settings. The SoCQ…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Educational Change, Educational Innovation, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hana Svobodová; Petr Trahorsch – International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2025
Geographical Olympiads are disciplinary competitions that can be a tool for assessing geographical knowledge and skills in different countries of the world. This article aims to analyse the results of the national and international geography Olympiads and to identify their conditionality and interrelationship. The secondary aim is to find out…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Geography, Geography Instruction, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Sandip Sinharay – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Although there exists an extensive amount of research on subscores and their properties, limited research has been conducted on categorical subscores and their interpretations. In this paper, we focus on the claim of Feinberg and von Davier that categorical subscores are useful for remediation and instructional purposes. We investigate this claim…
Descriptors: Tests, Scores, Test Interpretation, Alternative Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lyrica Lucas; Anum Khushal; Robert Mayes; Brian A. Couch; Joseph Dauer – International Journal of Science Education, 2025
Educational reform priorities such as emphasis on quantitative modelling (QM) have positioned undergraduate biology instructors as designers of QM experiences to engage students in authentic science practices that support the development of data-driven and evidence-based reasoning. Yet, little is known about how biology instructors adapt to the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, College Science, Biology, Classroom Observation Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
B. Goecke; S. Weiss; B. Barbot – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The present paper questions the content validity of the eight creativity-related self-report scales available in PISA 2022's context questionnaire and provides a set of considerations for researchers interested in using these indexes. Specifically, we point out some threats to the content validity of these scales (e.g., "creative thinking…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Questionnaires, Content Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephen M. Leach; Jason C. Immekus; Jeffrey C. Valentine; Prathiba Batley; Dena Dossett; Tamara Lewis; Thomas Reece – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2025
Educators commonly use school climate survey scores to inform and evaluate interventions for equitably improving learning and reducing educational disparities. Unfortunately, validity evidence to support these (and other) score uses often falls short. In response, Whitehouse et al. proposed a collaborative, two-part validity testing framework for…
Descriptors: School Surveys, Measurement, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Educational Environment
Anne H. Davidson – National Assessment Governing Board, 2025
The purpose of this National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Achievement Levels Validity Argument Report is to synthesize evidence currently available to address the validity of the interpretations and uses of the NAEP Achievement Levels. Validity is the extent to which theory and evidence supports or refutes proposed and enacted test…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Academic Achievement, Test Validity, College Entrance Examinations