Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Automation | 3 |
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Creative Thinking | 2 |
Creativity | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Art | 1 |
Art Products | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Creative Behavior | 3 |
Author
Benjamin Goecke | 1 |
Boris Forthmann | 1 |
Buczak, Philip | 1 |
Chiara Castrucci | 1 |
Clare Hindley | 1 |
Doebler, Philipp | 1 |
Forthmann, Boris | 1 |
Francisco Tigre Moura | 1 |
Huang, He | 1 |
Kurt Haim | 1 |
Paul V. DiStefano | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Benjamin Goecke; Paul V. DiStefano; Wolfgang Aschauer; Kurt Haim; Roger Beaty; Boris Forthmann – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
Automated scoring is a current hot topic in creativity research. However, most research has focused on the English language and popular verbal creative thinking tasks, such as the alternate uses task. Therefore, in this study, we present a large language model approach for automated scoring of a scientific creative thinking task that assesses…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Thinking, Scoring, Automation
Francisco Tigre Moura; Chiara Castrucci; Clare Hindley – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2023
This paper presents a study analyzing the perception of artistic products created by or with the support of artificial intelligence (AI). The research builds on previous studies revealing that the output of artificial creativity processes can indeed rival human-made products, satisfy consumer expectations, and derive enjoyment. However, in…
Descriptors: Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, Art, Automation
Buczak, Philip; Huang, He; Forthmann, Boris; Doebler, Philipp – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2023
Traditionally, researchers employ human raters for scoring responses to creative thinking tasks. Apart from the associated costs this approach entails two potential risks. First, human raters can be subjective in their scoring behavior (inter-rater-variance). Second, individual raters are prone to inconsistent scoring patterns…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Creative Thinking