Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Minerva: A Review of Science,… | 7 |
Author
Bal, Ravtosh | 1 |
Bozeman, Barry | 1 |
Franssen, Thomas | 1 |
Gläser, Jochen | 1 |
Harsh, Matthew | 1 |
Hellström, Christina | 1 |
Hellström, Tomas | 1 |
Hessels, Laurens K. | 1 |
Holden, Kerry | 1 |
Laudel, Grit | 1 |
Scholten, Wout | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Sweden | 3 |
Netherlands | 2 |
Europe | 1 |
Germany | 1 |
Kenya | 1 |
Switzerland | 1 |
Uganda | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hellström, Tomas; Hellström, Christina – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2020
Project funding rarely demands much change on behalf of the recipient. In contrast, cross-sectoral mobility funding requires recipients to change their environment and often some aspects of their research. There is a need to understand the impact on the researchers' experiences as knowledge producers within such programs, as part of the broader…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research Projects, Financial Support, Researchers
Öznur Karakas – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2024
E-science, or networked, collaborative and multidisciplinary scientific research on a shared e-infrastructure using computational tools, methods and applications, has also brought about new networked organizational forms in the transition of higher education towards the entrepreneurial academy. While the under-representation of women in ICTs is…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research and Development, Research Universities, Researchers
Serrano Velarde, Kathia – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2018
Although existing scholarship offers critical insights into the working mechanisms of project-based research funding, little is known about the actual practice of writing grant proposals. Our study seeks to add a longitudinal dimension to the ongoing debate on the implications of competitive research funding by focusing on the incremental…
Descriptors: Proposal Writing, Grantsmanship, Institutional Characteristics, Research Projects
Franssen, Thomas; Scholten, Wout; Hessels, Laurens K.; de Rijcke, Sarah – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2018
Over the past decades, science funding shows a shift from recurrent block funding towards project funding mechanisms. However, our knowledge of how project funding arrangements influence the organizational and epistemic properties of research is limited. To study this relation, a bridge between science policy studies and science studies is…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Innovation, Institutional Characteristics, Research Administration
Whitley, Richard; Gläser, Jochen; Laudel, Grit – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2018
The past three decades have witnessed a sharp reduction in the rate of growth of public research funding, and sometimes an actual decline in its level. In many countries, this decline has been accompanied by substantial changes in the ways that such funding has been allocated and monitored. In addition, the institutions governing how research is…
Descriptors: Innovation, Educational Research, Biology, Physics
Harsh, Matthew; Bal, Ravtosh; Wetmore, Jameson; Zachary, G. Pascal; Holden, Kerry – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2018
The emergence of vibrant research communities of computer scientists in Kenya and Uganda has occurred in the context of neoliberal privatization, commercialization, and transnational capital flows from donors and corporations. We explore how this funding environment configures research culture and research practices, which are conceptualized as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research Projects, Research Administration, Longitudinal Studies
Youtie, Jan; Bozeman, Barry – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2016
Publishing is central to the academic reward system. Contributorship issues loom large in this context. The need for fairness in authorship decisions is upheld in most collaborations, yet some collaborations are plagued by "nightmare" issues ranging from inappropriate authorship credit to author order issues to exploitation of students…
Descriptors: Authors, Faculty Publishing, Cooperation, Researchers