Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Chemistry Education Research… | 2 |
Across the Disciplines | 1 |
Journal of Biological… | 1 |
Psychology Teaching Review | 1 |
Theory and Research in Social… | 1 |
Author
Egege, Sandra | 1 |
Field M. Watts | 1 |
Ginger V. Shultz | 1 |
Juli D. Uhl | 1 |
Kelly, Matthew A. | 1 |
Kevin C. Haudek | 1 |
Klijnstra, Thomas | 1 |
Luo, Xiuling | 1 |
Megan Shiroda | 1 |
Ruijs, Gerard J. F. | 1 |
Savenije, Geerte M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
China | 1 |
Michigan | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Field M. Watts; Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Ginger V. Shultz – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2024
Research on student learning in organic chemistry indicates that students tend to focus on surface level features of molecules with less consideration of implicit properties when engaging in mechanistic reasoning. Writing-to-learn (WTL) is one approach for supporting students' mechanistic reasoning. A variation of WTL incorporates peer review and…
Descriptors: Organic Chemistry, Writing Assignments, Design, Peer Evaluation
Klijnstra, Thomas; Stoel, Gerhard L.; Ruijs, Gerard J. F.; Savenije, Geerte M.; van Boxtel, Carla A. M. – Theory and Research in Social Education, 2023
This study aims to describe components and levels of upper secondary social science students' reasoning about social problems. We consulted conceptualizations of social scientific reasoning in sociology textbooks and social science education literature, analyzed student papers, and conducted focus groups with social science teachers and teacher…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Thinking Skills, Science and Society, Social Sciences
Juli D. Uhl; Megan Shiroda; Kevin C. Haudek – Journal of Biological Education, 2024
National calls to improve science education include focusing on scientific practices coupled with learning disciplinary core ideas. Among the practices is constructing explanations. In the field of cellular and molecular biology, explanations typically include a mechanism and can be used to make predictions about phenomena. In this work, we…
Descriptors: Molecular Biology, Cytology, Genetics, Scientific Concepts
Luo, Xiuling; Wei, Bing; Shi, Min; Xiao, Xin – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2020
Using the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy as the analytic framework, this study examined the impact of the reasoning flow scaffold (RFS) on students' written arguments. Two classes with a total of 88 10th grade students in a school participated in this study. One class, set as the experimental group, was taught scientific…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Persuasive Discourse, Science Process Skills, Outcomes of Education
Egege, Sandra; Vered, Karen Orr – Across the Disciplines, 2019
It is commonly accepted in the academy that developing a critical thinking capacity and related capabilities will make students more effective thinkers and writers, and that these are desirable traits for graduates to have no matter what path they take after graduation. While most academics agree that critical thinking is an essential component of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Critical Thinking, Abstract Reasoning, Inquiry
Kelly, Matthew A.; West, Robert L. – Psychology Teaching Review, 2017
The task of turning undergrads into academics requires teaching them to reason about the world in a more complex way. We present the Argument Complexity Scale, a tool for analysing the complexity of argumentation, based on the Integrative Complexity and Conceptual Complexity Scales from, respectively, political psychology and personality theory.…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Teaching Methods, Persuasive Discourse, Difficulty Level