Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Age Differences | 3 |
Statistical Inference | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Statistics Education | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Age Groups | 1 |
Attitude Change | 1 |
Attribution Theory | 1 |
Beliefs | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Costa Rica | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
María Magdalena Gea; Luis Armando Hernández-Solís; Carmen Batanero; Rocío Álvarez-Arroyo – Journal on Mathematics Education, 2023
This paper analyzes the relationship between proportional reasoning and understanding fair games in Costa Rican students. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the answers to six items on comparing ratios of increasing difficulty level and another item on prize estimation in a fair game. We describe the strategies employed and…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Mathematics Instruction, Foreign Countries, Statistics Education
Jennifer Hill; George Perrett; Stacey A. Hancock; Le Win; Yoav Bergner – Grantee Submission, 2024
Most current statistics courses include some instruction relevant to causal inference. Whether this instruction is incorporated as material on randomized experiments or as an interpretation of associations measured by correlation or regression coefficients, the way in which this material is presented may have important implications for…
Descriptors: Statistics Education, Teaching Methods, Attribution Theory, Undergraduate Students
Swire, Briony; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Lewandowsky, Stephan – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
People frequently continue to use inaccurate information in their reasoning even after a credible retraction has been presented. This phenomenon is often referred to as the continued influence effect of misinformation. The repetition of the original misconception within a retraction could contribute to this phenomenon, as it could inadvertently…
Descriptors: Information Utilization, Familiarity, Error Correction, Misconceptions