Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 5 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 9 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 30 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Dong, Nianbo | 3 |
Kelcey, Ben | 2 |
Li, Wei | 2 |
Spybrook, Jessaca | 2 |
Adam Sales | 1 |
Amy Kemp-Inman | 1 |
Angela C. Webster | 1 |
Angela I. Preston | 1 |
Angie Barba | 1 |
Anna Lene Seidler | 1 |
Anthony, Jason L. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 26 |
Journal Articles | 23 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Virginia | 2 |
Connecticut | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Greece | 1 |
Kenya | 1 |
Massachusetts (Boston) | 1 |
Nevada | 1 |
New York | 1 |
New York (New York) | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Expressive One Word Picture… | 1 |
Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kylie E. Hunter; Mason Aberoumand; Sol Libesman; James X. Sotiropoulos; Jonathan G. Williams; Jannik Aagerup; Rui Wang; Ben W. Mol; Wentao Li; Angie Barba; Nipun Shrestha; Angela C. Webster; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Increasing concerns about the trustworthiness of research have prompted calls to scrutinise studies' Individual Participant Data (IPD), but guidance on how to do this was lacking. To address this, we developed the IPD Integrity Tool to screen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for integrity issues. Development of the tool involved a literature…
Descriptors: Integrity, Randomized Controlled Trials, Participant Characteristics, Computer Software
Nianbo Dong; Benjamin Kelcey; Jessaca Spybrook; Yanli Xie; Dung Pham; Peilin Qiu; Ning Sui – Grantee Submission, 2024
Multisite trials that randomize individuals (e.g., students) within sites (e.g., schools) or clusters (e.g., teachers/classrooms) within sites (e.g., schools) are commonly used for program evaluation because they provide opportunities to learn about treatment effects as well as their heterogeneity across sites and subgroups (defined by moderating…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Research, Effect Size
Maite Alguacil; Noemí Herranz-Zarzoso; José C. Pernías; Gerardo Sabater-Grande – Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2024
Cheating in online exams without face-to-face proctoring has been a general concern for academic instructors during the crisis caused by COVID-19. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the cost of these dishonest practices by comparing the academic performance of webcam-proctored students and their unproctored peers in an online gradable test.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Randomized Controlled Trials, Supervision
Yuan Tian; Xi Yang; Suhail A. Doi; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Lifeng Lin; Joey S. W. Kwong; Chang Xu – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
RobotReviewer is a tool for automatically assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials, but there is limited evidence of its reliability. We evaluated the agreement between RobotReviewer and humans regarding the risk of bias assessment based on 1955 randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in these trials was assessed via two…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Classification, Robotics
Li, Wei; Dong, Nianbo; Maynarad, Rebecca; Spybrook, Jessaca; Kelcey, Ben – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2023
Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are commonly used to evaluate educational interventions, particularly their effectiveness. Recently there has been greater emphasis on using these trials to explore cost-effectiveness. However, methods for establishing the power of cluster randomized cost-effectiveness trials (CRCETs) are limited. This study…
Descriptors: Research Design, Statistical Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Cost Effectiveness
Yanping Pei; Adam Sales; Johann Gagnon-Bartsch – Grantee Submission, 2024
Randomized A/B tests within online learning platforms enable us to draw unbiased causal estimators. However, precise estimates of treatment effects can be challenging due to minimal participation, resulting in underpowered A/B tests. Recent advancements indicate that leveraging auxiliary information from detailed logs and employing design-based…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Learning Management Systems, Causal Models, Learning Analytics
Kristin Porter; Luke Miratrix; Kristen Hunter – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Background: Researchers are often interested in testing the effectiveness of an intervention on multiple outcomes, for multiple subgroups, at multiple points in time, or across multiple treatment groups. The resulting multiplicity of statistical hypothesis tests can lead to spurious findings of effects. Multiple testing procedures (MTPs)…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Computer Software, Randomized Controlled Trials
Li, Wei; Dong, Nianbo; Maynard, Rebecca A. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020
Cost-effectiveness analysis is a widely used educational evaluation tool. The randomized controlled trials that aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment are commonly referred to as randomized cost-effectiveness trials (RCETs). This study provides methods of power analysis for two-level multisite RCETs. Power computations take…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Research
Su, Yu-Xuan; Tu, Yu-Kang – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Network meta-analysis compares multiple treatments in terms of their efficacy and harm by including evidence from randomized controlled trials. Most clinical trials use parallel design, where patients are randomly allocated to different treatments and receive only 1 treatment. However, some trials use within person designs such as split-body,…
Descriptors: Network Analysis, Meta Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design
Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Craig, Rodger; Campbell, Sandy – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: Evidence from new health technologies is growing, along with demands for evidence to inform policy decisions, creating challenges in completing health technology assessments (HTAs)/systematic reviews (SRs) in a timely manner. Software can decrease the time and burden by automating the process, but evidence validating such software is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Decision Making, Randomized Controlled Trials
McHugh, Douglas; Feinn, Richard; McIlvenna, Jeff; Trevithick, Matt – Education Sciences, 2021
Learner-centered coaching and feedback are relevant to various educational contexts. Spaced retrieval enhances long-term knowledge retention. We examined the efficacy of Blank Slate, a novel spaced retrieval software application, to promote learning and prevent forgetting, while gathering and analyzing data in the background about learners'…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Learning Analytics, Coaching (Performance), Formative Evaluation
Isaac M. Opper – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2021
Researchers often include covariates when they analyze the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), valuing the increased precision of the estimates over the potential of inducing small-sample bias when doing so. In this paper, we develop a sufficient condition which ensures that the inclusion of covariates does not cause small-sample bias…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Sample Size, Statistical Bias, Artificial Intelligence
Dong, Nianbo; Spybrook, Jessaca; Kelcey, Ben – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2017
The purpose of this paper is to present results of recent advances in power analyses to detect the moderator effects in Cluster Randomized Trials (CRTs). This paper focus on demonstration of the software PowerUp!-Moderator. This paper provides a resource for researchers seeking to design CRTs with adequate power to detect the moderator effects of…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials, Statistical Analysis
Lohr, Sharon L.; Zhu, Xiaoshu – Sociological Methods & Research, 2017
Many randomized experiments in the social sciences allocate subjects to treatment arms at the time the subjects enroll. Desirable features of the mechanism used to assign subjects to treatment arms are often (1) equal numbers of subjects in intervention and control arms, (2) balanced allocation for population subgroups and across covariates, (3)…
Descriptors: Social Science Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Computer Software
Thoemmes, Felix; Liao, Wang; Jin, Ze – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
This article describes the analysis of regression-discontinuity designs (RDDs) using the R packages rdd, rdrobust, and rddtools. We discuss similarities and differences between these packages and provide directions on how to use them effectively. We use real data from the Carolina Abecedarian Project to show how an analysis of an RDD can be…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Research Design, Robustness (Statistics), Computer Software
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2