Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Grade 3 | 6 |
Test Length | 6 |
Reading Tests | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Mathematics Tests | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
Differences | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Behavioral Research and… | 1 |
ETS Research Report Series | 1 |
Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
Journal of Special Education… | 1 |
Montgomery County Public… | 1 |
NWEA | 1 |
Author
Alonzo, Julie | 1 |
Battista, Carmela | 1 |
Campana, Kayla V. | 1 |
Dawes, Jillian M. | 1 |
James, Syretta R. | 1 |
Kahn, Josh | 1 |
Li, Feifei | 1 |
Liu, Shihching Jessica | 1 |
Maina, Nyambura | 1 |
Markus Gebhardt | 1 |
Marr, Erin A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 3 | 5 |
Early Childhood Education | 4 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Primary Education | 4 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Measures of Academic Progress | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nikola Ebenbeck; Markus Gebhardt – Journal of Special Education Technology, 2024
Technologies that enable individualization for students have significant potential in special education. Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) refers to digital assessments that automatically adjust their difficulty level based on students' abilities, allowing for personalized, efficient, and accurate measurement. This article examines whether CAT…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Students with Disabilities, Special Education, Grade 3
Precision of Single-Skill Math CBM Time-Series Data: The Effect of Probe Stratification and Set Size
Solomon, Benjamin G.; Payne, Lexy L.; Campana, Kayla V.; Marr, Erin A.; Battista, Carmela; Silva, Alex; Dawes, Jillian M. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2020
Comparatively little research exists on single-skill math (SSM) curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) for the purpose of monitoring growth, as may be done in practice or when monitoring intervention effectiveness within group or single-case research. Therefore, we examined a common variant of SSM-CBM: 1 digit × 1 digit multiplication. Reflecting…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Mathematics Tests, Mathematics Skills, Multiplication
James, Syretta R.; Liu, Shihching Jessica; Maina, Nyambura; Wade, Julie; Wang, Helen; Wilson, Heather; Wolanin, Natalie – Montgomery County Public Schools, 2021
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to overwhelm the functioning and outcomes of educational systems throughout the nation. The public education system is under particular scrutiny given that students, families, and educators are under considerable stress to maintain academic progress. Since the beginning of the crisis, school-systems…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, COVID-19, Pandemics, Public Schools
Li, Feifei – ETS Research Report Series, 2017
An information-correction method for testlet-based tests is introduced. This method takes advantage of both generalizability theory (GT) and item response theory (IRT). The measurement error for the examinee proficiency parameter is often underestimated when a unidimensional conditional-independence IRT model is specified for a testlet dataset. By…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Generalizability Theory, Tests, Error of Measurement
NWEA, 2018
Thousands of U.S. school districts and many international schools use MAP® Growth™ to monitor the academic growth of their students and to inform instruction. The MAP Growth assessment is untimed, meaning that limits are not placed on how much time a student has to respond to the items. However, to help schools understand the amount of time MAP…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Test Length, Achievement Gains, Mathematics Tests
Kahn, Josh; Nese, Joseph T.; Alonzo, Julie – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2016
There is strong theoretical support for oral reading fluency (ORF) as an essential building block of reading proficiency. The current and standard ORF assessment procedure requires that students read aloud a grade-level passage (˜ 250 words) in a one-to-one administration, with the number of words read correctly in 60 seconds constituting their…
Descriptors: Teacher Surveys, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Computer Assisted Testing