Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Carlson, Sarah E. | 2 |
Clinton, Virginia E. | 1 |
Dahl, Amanda C. | 1 |
Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck | 1 |
McCarthy, Kathryn S. | 1 |
Renken, Maggie | 1 |
Reynolds, Erin | 1 |
Seipel, Ben | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dahl, Amanda C.; Carlson, Sarah E.; Renken, Maggie; McCarthy, Kathryn S.; Reynolds, Erin – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2021
Purpose: Complex features of science texts present idiosyncratic challenges for middle grade readers, especially in a post-Common Core educational world where students' learning is dependent on understanding informational text. The primary aim of this study was to explore how middle school readers process science texts and whether such…
Descriptors: Science Materials, Textbooks, Difficulty Level, Readability
Geoffrey G. Pinchbeck – Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2019
This article examines how English as a foreign language learners might be better matched to reading texts using automatic readability analysis. Specifically, I examine how the lexical decoding component of readability might be validated. In Japan, readability has been mostly determined by publishers or by professional reading organizations who…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computational Linguistics
Seipel, Ben; Carlson, Sarah E.; Clinton, Virginia E. – Reading Psychology, 2017
The purpose of this study was to examine moment-by-moment fluctuations in text comprehension processing and determine how and when poor and good comprehenders differ. To do so, we reanalyzed a dataset of think-aloud protocols from 138 intermediate elementary students. Both good and poor comprehenders used a variety of processing strategies when…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Text Structure, Reading Comprehension, Reader Text Relationship