NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
František Bartoš; Maximilian Maier; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Franziska Nippold; Hristos Doucouliagos; John P. A. Ioannidis; Willem M. Otte; Martina Sladekova; Teshome K. Deresssa; Stephan B. Bruns; Daniele Fanelli; T. D. Stanley – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Publication selection bias undermines the systematic accumulation of evidence. To assess the extent of this problem, we survey over 68,000 meta-analyses containing over 700,000 effect size estimates from medicine (67,386/597,699), environmental sciences (199/12,707), psychology (605/23,563), and economics (327/91,421). Our results indicate that…
Descriptors: Publications, Selection, Bias, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yechiam, Eldad; Ashby, Nathaniel J. S.; Hochman, Guy – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
The majority of the literature on the psychology of gains and losses suggests that losses lead to an avoidance response. Several studies, however, have shown that losses can also lead to an approach response, whereby an option is selected more often when it produces losses. In five studies we examine the boundary conditions for these contradictory…
Descriptors: Fear, Responses, Attention, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cahan, Sorel; Nirel, Ronit; Gamliel, Eyal – Higher Education Studies, 2018
Predictive validity considerations in selection dictate choice of the predictor with the highest predictive validity. Implementation of this principle in any specific selection process inevitably entails choice between imperfectly correlated alternative predictors, real or hypothetical, which are equivalent in terms of predictive validity. We show…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Higher Education, Predictive Validity, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Betsch, Tilmann; Lehmann, Anne; Lindow, Stefanie; Lang, Anna; Schoemann, Martin – Developmental Psychology, 2016
Adaptive decision making in probabilistic environments requires individuals to use probabilities as weights in predecisional information searches and/or when making subsequent choices. Within a child-friendly computerized environment (Mousekids), we tracked 205 children's (105 children 5-6 years of age and 100 children 9-10 years of age) and 103…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Children, Adults, Decision Making