Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Word Processing | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Collaborative Writing | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Inclusion | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Spain | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Binh H. Vu; Darius Postma; Don Hickerson; James McGaughran; Huy Q. Khuat – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024
This study investigates the efficacy of six major Generative AI (GenAI) text detectors when confronted with machine-generated content modified to evade detection (n = 805). We compare these detectors to assess their reliability in identifying AI-generated text in educational settings, where they are increasingly used to address academic integrity…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Inclusion, Computer Software, Word Processing
Download full textMayo Beltrán, Alba Mª; Fernández Sánchez, María Jesús; Montanero Fernández, Manuel; Martín Parejo, David – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
This study compares the effects of two resources, a paper rubric (CR) or the comment bubbles from a word processor (CCB), to support peer co-evaluation of expository texts in primary education. A total of 57 students wrote a text which, after a peer co-evaluation process, was rewritten. To analyze the improvements in the texts, we used a rubric…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Evaluation Methods, Word Processing, Computer Software
