Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Ben Seipel | 1 |
| Finestack, Lizbeth | 1 |
| Kim, Dong-In | 1 |
| Kuchler, Kirstin | 1 |
| Mark L. Davison | 1 |
| Patrick C. Kennedy | 1 |
| Sarah E. Carlson | 1 |
| Tomkowicz, Joanna | 1 |
| Virginia Clinton-Lisell | 1 |
| Wan, Ping | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textKuchler, Kirstin; Finestack, Lizbeth – Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 2022
The use of multiple-choice testing is common among all levels of education. This study examined one type of multiple-choice testing: the Immediate Feedback--Assessment Technique®? (IF-AT®?), which uses an answer-until-correct testing format. More than 300 undergraduate students in a speech-language-hearing sciences course used the IF-AT®? to take…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Tomkowicz, Joanna; Kim, Dong-In; Wan, Ping – Online Submission, 2022
In this study we evaluated the stability of item parameters and student scores, using the pre-equated (pre-pandemic) parameters from Spring 2019 and post-equated (post-pandemic) parameters from Spring 2021 in two calibration and equating designs related to item parameter treatment: re-estimating all anchor parameters (Design 1) and holding the…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, Evaluation Methods, Pandemics
Ben Seipel; Sarah E. Carlson; Virginia Clinton-Lisell; Mark L. Davison; Patrick C. Kennedy – Grantee Submission, 2022
Originally designed for students in Grades 3 through 5, MOCCA (formerly the Multiple-choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment), identifies students who struggle with comprehension, and helps uncover why they struggle. There are many reasons why students might not comprehend what they read. They may struggle with decoding, or reading words…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Reading Tests
