NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hawlitschek, Anja; Berndt, Sarah; Schulz, Sandra – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Pair programming is an important approach to fostering students' programming and collaborative learning skills. However, the empirical findings on pair programming are mixed, especially concerning effective instructional design. Objective: The objective of this literature review is to provide lecturers with systematic…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Programming, Computer Science Education, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huang, Joey; Parker, Miranda C. – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Computational thinking (CT) is a critical part of computing education in middle school. The existing practices of collaboration and collaborative design activities at this education level pairs well with CT practices, but this interaction has previously been under-explored in the existing literature. Objective: In this…
Descriptors: Computation, Thinking Skills, Cooperative Learning, Skill Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meghan M. Parkinson; Seppe Hermans; David Gijbels; Daniel L. Dinsmore – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: More data are needed about how young learners identify and fix errors while programming in pairs. Objective: The study will identify discernible patterns in the intersection between debugging processes and the type of regulation used during debugging while children engage in coding to drive further theory and model…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Troubleshooting, Cooperative Learning, Coding
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schulz, Sandra; Berndt, Sarah; Hawlitschek, Anja – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Collaborative and cooperative learning is important to prepare students for their future work and to increase their learning performance in university courses. Several studies have shown promising results regarding team activities, such as pair programming. However, there is little information on how teamwork is currently…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Computer Science Education, Higher Education, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zachary M. Savelson; Kasia Muldner – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: Productive failure (PF) is a learning paradigm that flips the order of instruction: students work on a problem, then receive a lesson. PF increases learning, but less is known about student emotions and collaboration during PF, particularly in a computer science context. Objective: To provide insight on students' emotions…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Psychological Patterns, Fear, Failure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vandenberg, Jessica; Lynch, Collin; Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth; Wiebe, Eric – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Students' self-efficacy toward computing affect their participation in related tasks and courses. Self-efficacy is likely influenced by students' initial experiences and exposure to computer science (CS) activities. Moreover, student interest in a subject likely informs their ability to effectively regulate their learning…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Cooperative Learning, Programming, Network Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bikanga Ada, Mireilla; Foster, Mary Ellen – Computer Science Education, 2023
Objective: This study explores postgraduate students' perceptions of the modified team-based learning instructional approach used to teach it and the extent to which the Bootcamp course improves their practical skills. Method: In the beginning, participants (n = 185) were asked to rate their practical experience on the taught topics. At the end…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Cooperative Learning, Program Length, Computer Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Indriasari, Theresia Devi; Denny, Paul; Lottridge, Danielle; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Peer code review activities provide well-documented benefits to students in programming courses. Students develop relevant skills through exposure to alternative coding solutions, producing and receiving feedback, and collaboration with peers. Despite these benefits, low student motivation has been identified as one of the…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Student Motivation, Cooperative Learning, Programming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kale, Ugur; Yuan, Jiangmei; Roy, Abhik – Computer Science Education, 2023
Background and Context: Various coding initiatives and materials exist such as those on Code.org site to promote students' computational thinking (CT). However, little is known as to: (a) whether such materials, in fact, promote CT and (b) how CT skills are related to each other. Objective: As a preliminary step to identify CT skills addressed in…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Computer Science Education, Programming, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhanxia Yang; Marina Bers – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: Historically, women have been underrepresented in computer science. To address this gender gap, researchers advocate for high-quality computer science programs for early childhood. Objectives: This study examines gender differences in coding performance before and after implementing a 24-lesson visual programming curriculum…
Descriptors: Gender Differences, Grade 1, Elementary School Students, Programming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zakaria, Zarifa; Vandenberg, Jessica; Tsan, Jennifer; Boulden, Danielle Cadieux; Lynch, Collin F.; Boyer, Kristy Elizabeth; Wiebe, Eric N. – Computer Science Education, 2022
Background and Context: Researchers and practitioners have begun to incorporate collaboration in programming because of its reported instructional and professional benefits. However, younger students need guidance on how to collaborate in environments that require substantial interpersonal interaction and negotiation. Previous research indicates…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Intervention, Comparative Analysis, Programming