Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Error Patterns | 6 |
| Cognitive Processes | 5 |
| Conflict | 5 |
| Foreign Countries | 4 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Reaction Time | 3 |
| Color | 2 |
| Concept Formation | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Interference (Learning) | 2 |
| Visual Stimuli | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
| Interactive Learning… | 1 |
| International Journal of… | 1 |
| Journal of American College… | 1 |
| Studies in Science Education | 1 |
Author
| Lupker, Stephen J. | 2 |
| Spinelli, Giacomo | 2 |
| Erick J. Fedorenko | 1 |
| I Nengah Parta | 1 |
| Iwan Setiawan HR | 1 |
| Jake A. Rattigan | 1 |
| Kyle T. Brennan | 1 |
| Lu, Jijian | 1 |
| Patrick V. Barnwell | 1 |
| Potvin, Patrice | 1 |
| Purwanto | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 4 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPatrick V. Barnwell; Jake A. Rattigan; Kyle T. Brennan; Erick J. Fedorenko; Richard J. Contrada – Journal of American College Health, 2025
Objectives: To examine college students' conflicting COVID-19 information exposure, information-seeking, concern, and cognitive functioning. Participants: 179 undergraduates were recruited in March-April 2020, and 220 in September 2020 (Samples 1 and 2, respectively). Methods: Students completed the Attention Network Test, NASA Task Load Index,…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Undergraduate Students, Information Seeking
Potvin, Patrice – Studies in Science Education, 2023
This article presents a critical and systematic review of the science education research literature that explores the response of learners to contradicting information (anomalous data). The review is framed in the cognitive conflict process model (CCPM) and provides an analysis of (1) the types and frequency of possible responses, (2) the…
Descriptors: Science Education, Science Process Skills, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level
Download full textIwan Setiawan HR; Purwanto; Sukoriyanto; I Nengah Parta – International Journal of Educational Methodology, 2023
This study aims to evaluate cognitive conflict in constructing mathematical concepts, based on thinking errors. The data were collected through observations of words or sentences, leading to the derivation of qualitative outputs. Furthermore, the results showed that the two selected subjects experienced cognitive conflicts regarding thinking…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Conflict, Thinking Skills, Error Patterns
Spinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
In the standard Proportion-Congruent (PC) paradigm, performance is compared between a list containing mostly congruent (MC) stimuli (e.g., the word RED in the color red in the Stroop task; Stroop, 1935) and a list containing mostly incongruent (MI) stimuli (e.g., the word BLUE in red). The PC effect, the finding that the congruency effect (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Conflict, Cognitive Processes, Reaction Time
Lu, Jijian; Tao, Yan; Xu, Jinghao; Stephens, Max – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
This study is the extension of our previous visualizing study on the commognition processes in computer-supported one-to-one tutoring. With the help of the scale of commognitive responsibility score, we found that the main triggers of the commognition process shift are the positive transfer of knowledge and cognitive conflict. On the basis of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Computer Assisted Instruction, Tutoring, Artificial Intelligence
Spinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
In the Stroop task, congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between incongruent stimuli, e.g., the word BLUE written in the color red, and congruent stimuli, e.g., RED in red) are smaller in a list in which incongruent trials are frequent than in a list in which incongruent trials are infrequent. The traditional explanation…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Visual Stimuli, Reaction Time
