NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
J. Staal; K. Katarya; M. Speelman; R. Brand; J. Alsma; J. Sloane; W. W. Van den Broek; L. Zwaan – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2024
Diagnostic errors are a major, largely preventable, patient safety concern. Error interventions cannot feasibly be implemented for every patient that is seen. To identify cases at high risk of error, clinicians should have a good calibration between their perceived and actual accuracy. This experiment studied the impact of feedback on medical…
Descriptors: Performance, Feedback (Response), Medical Students, Graduate Medical Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kunar, Melina A. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2022
People miss a high proportion of targets that only appear rarely. This low prevalence (LP) effect has implications for applied search tasks such as the clinical reading of mammograms. Computer aided detection (CAD) has been used to help radiologists search mammograms by highlighting areas likely to contain a cancer. Previous research has found a…
Descriptors: Incidence, Screening Tests, Cancer, Radiology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adamo, Stephen H.; Gereke, Brian J.; Shomstein, Sarah; Schmidt, Joseph – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2021
For over 50 years, the satisfaction of search effect has been studied within the field of radiology. Defined as a decrease in detection rates for a subsequent target when an initial target is found within the image, these multiple target errors are known to underlie errors of omission (e.g., a radiologist is more likely to miss an abnormality if…
Descriptors: Radiology, Error Patterns, Cognitive Science, Satisfaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eder, Thésése F.; Richter, Juliane; Scheiter, Katharina; Huettig, Fabian; Keutel, Constanze – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2021
Dental students commit many errors when diagnosing radiographs. To improve performance, students were asked to compare radiographs (with and without disease or with the same disease); relevant structures were highlighted in the radiographs. In a crossover design, students were randomly assigned to two groups differing in training order: Students…
Descriptors: Dentistry, Graduate Students, Clinical Diagnosis, Radiology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Growns, Bethany; Towler, Alice; Dunn, James D.; Salerno, Jessica M.; Schweitzer, N. J.; Dror, Itiel E. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2022
Forensic science practitioners compare visual evidence samples (e.g. fingerprints) and decide if they originate from the same person or different people (i.e. fingerprint 'matching'). These tasks are perceptually and cognitively complex--even practising professionals can make errors--and what limited research exists suggests that existing…
Descriptors: Crime, Evidence, Sampling, Statistics Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eder, Thérése F.; Richter, Juliane; Scheiter, Katharina; Keutel, Constanze; Castner, Nora; Kasneci, Enkelejda; Huettig, Fabian – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2021
In dental medicine, interpreting radiographs (i.e., orthopantomograms, OPTs) is an error-prone process, even in experts. Effective intervention methods are therefore needed to support students in improving their image reading skills for OPTs. To this end, we developed a compare-and-contrast intervention, which aimed at supporting students in…
Descriptors: Dentistry, Medical Education, Radiology, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Manassi, Mauro; Ghirardo, Cristina; Canas-Bajo, Teresa; Ren, Zhihang; Prinzmetal, William; Whitney, David – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2021
In radiological screening, clinicians scan myriads of radiographs with the intent of recognizing and differentiating lesions. Even though they are trained experts, radiologists' human search engines are not perfect: average daily error rates are estimated around 3-5%. A main underlying assumption in radiological screening is that visual search on…
Descriptors: Radiology, Allied Health Personnel, Error Patterns, Screening Tests