NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reem S. W. Alyahya – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2025
Background: Assessing spoken discourse during aphasia clinical examination is crucial for diagnostic and rehabilitation purposes. Recent approaches have been developed to quantify content word fluency (CWF) and informativeness of spoken discourse without the need to perform time-consuming transcription and coding. However, the accuracy of these…
Descriptors: Arabic, Aphasia, Language Fluency, Check Lists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anita Pásztor-Kovács; Attila Pásztor; Gyöngyvér Molnár – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
In this paper, we present an agenda for the research directions we recommend in addressing the issues of realizing and evaluating communication in CPS instruments. We outline our ideas on potential ways to improve: (1) generalizability in Human-Human assessment tools and ecological validity in Human-Agent ones; (2) flexible and convenient use of…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Problem Solving, Evaluation Methods, Teamwork
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Merino, Laura; Martínez-Pampliega, Ana – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2022
The main aim of this study is to build a new observational coding system for sibling interactions (Sistema de Codificación de Interacciones entre Hermanos -- SCIH) and to analyze its psychometric properties and validity. First, this study offers the first Spanish adaptation of a self-report questionnaire to measure sibling relationships that…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Psychometrics, Observation, Coding
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Emre Zengin; Yasemin Karal – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2024
This study was carried out to develop a test to assess algorithmic thinking skills. To this end, the twelve steps suggested by Downing (2006) were adopted. Throughout the test development, 24 middle school sixth-grade students and eight experts in different areas took part as needed in the tasks on the project. The test was given to 252 students…
Descriptors: Grade 6, Algorithms, Thinking Skills, Evaluation Methods