Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Testing | 3 |
Academic Ability | 1 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Comparative Testing | 1 |
Data | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Dropouts | 1 |
Educational Change | 1 |
Educational Testing | 1 |
Feedback (Response) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Arnold, Ivo J. M. | 1 |
Baars, Gerard J. A. | 1 |
Hermus, Peter | 1 |
Kylie Gorney | 1 |
Renato Miceli | 1 |
Sandip Sinharay | 1 |
Schmidt, Henk G. | 1 |
Silvia Testa | 1 |
Smeets, Guus | 1 |
van der Molen, Henk T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Silvia Testa; Renato Miceli; Renato Miceli – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Random Equating (RE) and Heuristic Approach (HA) are two linking procedures that may be used to compare the scores of individuals in two tests that measure the same latent trait, in conditions where there are no common items or individuals. In this study, RE--that may only be used when the individuals taking the two tests come from the same…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Heuristics, Problem Solving, Personality Traits
Kylie Gorney; Sandip Sinharay – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
Test-takers, policymakers, teachers, and institutions are increasingly demanding that testing programs provide more detailed feedback regarding test performance. As a result, there has been a growing interest in the reporting of subscores that potentially provide such detailed feedback. Haberman developed a method based on classical test theory…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Theory, Test Items, Testing
Schmidt, Henk G.; Baars, Gerard J. A.; Hermus, Peter; van der Molen, Henk T.; Arnold, Ivo J. M.; Smeets, Guus – European Journal of Higher Education, 2022
The purpose of the study reported here was to observe the effects of examination practices on the extent to which university students procrastinate. These examination practices were: (1) limiting the number of resits, (2) compensatory rather than conjunctive decision-making about student progress, and (3) restricting the time available for…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Study Habits, Decision Making, Undergraduate Students