NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Robert J. Sternberg; Vlad Glaveanu; James C. Kaufman – Creativity Research Journal, 2024
In this exchange, the authors each address five questions about creativity, and then provide a final synthesizing response. The five questions they address are: (1) What is creativity? Are there different processes, types, or kinds of creativity, and if so, what are they? (2) What are the major obstacles to people thinking and acting creatively?…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Thinking, Thinking Skills, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
James C. Kaufman; Vlad P. Glaveanu – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The traditionally studied positive outcomes of creativity tend to be product-focused, such as Big-C contributions, good grades, or strong work performance. This paper makes an argument for the importance of less-discussed products of the process--the benefits that arise from being creative, regardless of one's abilities or level of achievement.…
Descriptors: Creative Development, Creative Thinking, Creativity, Self Concept
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simone A. Luchini; James C. Kaufman; Benjamin Goecke; Oliver Wilhelm; Yoed N. Kenett; Daisy Lei; Mathias Benedek; Janet G. van Hell; Roger E. Beaty – npj Science of Learning, 2025
Creativity is a key 21st-century skill and a consistent predictor of academic learning outcomes. Despite decades of research on creativity and learning, little is known about the cognitive mechanisms underlying their relationship. In two studies, we examined whether creativity supports associative learning through associative thinking--the ability…
Descriptors: Creativity, 21st Century Skills, Associative Learning, Association (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Denis Dumas; James C. Kaufman – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Who should evaluate the originality and task-appropriateness of a given idea has been a perennial debate among psychologists of creativity. Here, we argue that the most relevant evaluator of a given idea depends crucially on the level of expertise of the person who generated it. To build this argument, we draw on two complimentary theoretical…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Creativity, Task Analysis, Psychologists