Publication Date
In 2025 | 4 |
Since 2024 | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Computer Assisted… | 10 |
Author
Hendrik Drachsler | 2 |
Ioana Jivet | 2 |
Abhishek Chugh | 1 |
Andreas Frey | 1 |
Anique de Bruin | 1 |
Aron Fink | 1 |
Barbi Svetec | 1 |
Blaženka Divjak | 1 |
Damir Horvat | 1 |
Daniele Di Mitri | 1 |
Dennis Müller | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 10 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zirou Lin; Hanbing Yan; Li Zhao – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Peer assessment has played an important role in large-scale online learning, as it helps promote the effectiveness of learners' online learning. However, with the emergence of numerical grades and textual feedback generated by peers, it is necessary to detect the reliability of the large amount of peer assessment data, and then develop…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Automation, Grading, Models
Blaženka Divjak; Barbi Svetec; Damir Horvat – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Sound learning design should be based on the constructive alignment of intended learning outcomes (LOs), teaching and learning activities and formative and summative assessment. Assessment validity strongly relies on its alignment with LOs. Valid and reliable formative assessment can be analysed as a predictor of students' academic…
Descriptors: Automation, Formative Evaluation, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Umar Alkafaween; Ibrahim Albluwi; Paul Denny – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Automatically graded programming assignments provide instant feedback to students and significantly reduce manual grading time for instructors. However, creating comprehensive suites of test cases for programming problems within automatic graders can be time-consuming and complex. The effort needed to define test suites may deter some…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Introductory Courses, Programming
Onur Karademir; Daniele Di Mitri; Jan Schneider; Ioana Jivet; Jörn Allmang; Sebastian Gombert; Marcus Kubsch; Knut Neumann; Hendrik Drachsler – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Teacher dashboards can help secondary school teachers manage online learning activities and inform instructional decisions by visualising information about class learning. However, when designing teacher dashboards, it is not trivial to choose which information to display, because not all of the vast amount of information retrieved…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Secondary School Teachers, Educational Technology, Design
Elisabeth Bauer; Michael Sailer; Frank Niklas; Samuel Greiff; Sven Sarbu-Rothsching; Jan M. Zottmann; Jan Kiesewetter; Matthias Stadler; Martin R. Fischer; Tina Seidel; Detlef Urhahne; Maximilian Sailer; Frank Fischer – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing (NLP), enables automating the formative assessment of written task solutions to provide adaptive feedback automatically. A laboratory study found that, compared with static feedback (an expert solution), adaptive feedback automated through artificial neural networks…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Computer Simulation, Natural Language Processing
Leveraging Large Language Models to Generate Course-Specific Semantically Annotated Learning Objects
Dominic Lohr; Marc Berges; Abhishek Chugh; Michael Kohlhase; Dennis Müller – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Over the past few decades, the process and methodology of automatic question generation (AQG) have undergone significant transformations. Recent progress in generative natural language models has opened up new potential in the generation of educational content. Objectives: This paper explores the potential of large language models…
Descriptors: Resource Units, Semantics, Automation, Questioning Techniques
Ute Mertens; Marlit A. Lindner – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Educational assessments increasingly shift towards computer-based formats. Many studies have explored how different types of automated feedback affect learning. However, few studies have investigated how digital performance feedback affects test takers' ratings of affective-motivational reactions during a testing session. Method: In…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Feedback (Response)
Joshua Weidlich; Aron Fink; Ioana Jivet; Jane Yau; Tornike Giorgashvili; Hendrik Drachsler; Andreas Frey – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Developments in educational technology and learning analytics make it possible to automatically formulate and deploy personalized formative feedback to learners at scale. However, to be effective, the motivational and emotional impacts of such automated and personalized feedback need to be considered. The literature on feedback…
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Student Motivation, Feedback (Response), Automation
Héctor J. Pijeira-Díaz; Shashank Subramanya; Janneke van de Pol; Anique de Bruin – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: When learning causal relations, completing causal diagrams enhances students' comprehension judgements to some extent. To potentially boost this effect, advances in natural language processing (NLP) enable real-time formative feedback based on the automated assessment of students' diagrams, which can involve the correctness of both the…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Automation, Student Evaluation, Causal Models
Luzhen Tang; Kejie Shen; Huixiao Le; Yuan Shen; Shufang Tan; Yueying Zhao; Torsten Juelich; Xinyu Li; Dragan Gaševic; Yizhou Fan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Learners' writing skills are critical to their academic and professional development. Previous studies have shown that learners' self-assessment during writing is essential for assessing their writing products and monitoring their writing processes. However, conducting practical self-assessments of writing remains challenging for…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Formative Evaluation, Writing Assignments, Writing Skills