Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| International Assessment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Author
| Artur Pokropek | 1 |
| Carl Westine | 1 |
| Carmen Köhler | 1 |
| Johannes Hartig | 1 |
| Lale Khorramdel | 1 |
| Michelle Boyer | 1 |
| Stella Y. Kim | 1 |
| Tong Wu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTong Wu; Stella Y. Kim; Carl Westine; Michelle Boyer – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
While significant attention has been given to test equating to ensure score comparability, limited research has explored equating methods for rater-mediated assessments, where human raters inherently introduce error. If not properly addressed, these errors can undermine score interchangeability and test validity. This study proposes an equating…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Evaluators, Error of Measurement, Test Validity
Carmen Köhler; Lale Khorramdel; Artur Pokropek; Johannes Hartig – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2024
For assessment scales applied to different groups (e.g., students from different states; patients in different countries), multigroup differential item functioning (MG-DIF) needs to be evaluated in order to ensure that respondents with the same trait level but from different groups have equal response probabilities on a particular item. The…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Test Bias, Models, Item Response Theory
