Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Anxiety | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Communication (Thought… | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| English Language Learners | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Second Language Learning | 1 |
| Writing (Composition) | 1 |
Source
| Language Learning Journal | 1 |
Author
| Jinshi Shao | 1 |
| Rujing Huang | 1 |
| Simin Zeng | 1 |
| Yuxi Wu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Macau | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Foreign Language Classroom… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJinshi Shao; Yuxi Wu; Simin Zeng; Rujing Huang – Language Learning Journal, 2024
The present study examined the relative effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (WCF) on L2 learning and the mediating role of language anxiety in the effectiveness of these two types of WCF. Forty-five Chinese L2 learners of English were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions: direct WCF (n = 15), indirect WCF (n =…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Foreign Countries, Anxiety, Feedback (Response)
