Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
Descriptor
| Access to Information | 2 |
| Electronic Journals | 2 |
| Library Science | 2 |
| Budgets | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Electronic Publishing | 1 |
| Employee Attitudes | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Fees | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Christopher D. Vidas | 1 |
| DeDe Dawson | 1 |
| Jenessa M. McElfresh | 1 |
| Jessica L. Serrao | 1 |
| K. Megan Sheffield | 1 |
| Maggie Albro | 1 |
| Megan Palmer | 1 |
| Rachel Borchardt | 1 |
| Teresa Schultz | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMaggie Albro; Jessica L. Serrao; Christopher D. Vidas; Jenessa M. McElfresh; K. Megan Sheffield; Megan Palmer – portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2024
This article explores the application of journal quality and credibility evaluation tools to library science publications. The researchers investigate quality and credibility attributes of forty-eight peer-reviewed library science journals with open access components using two evaluative tools developed and published by librarians. The results…
Descriptors: Library Science, Periodicals, Access to Information, Librarians
Rachel Borchardt; Teresa Schultz; DeDe Dawson – College & Research Libraries, 2024
About half of Library and Information Science (LIS) journals continue to charge authors to publish articles open access (OA) or do not offer OA publishing at all. To further investigate the financial and other perceived barriers preventing these LIS journals from transitioning to no-publishing fee OA models, this exploratory project surveyed lead…
Descriptors: Editing, Library Science, Information Science, Access to Information
