NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202531
Since 202482
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 82 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jinshui Wang; Shuguang Chen; Zhengyi Tang; Pengchen Lin; Yupeng Wang – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Mastering SQL programming skills is fundamental in computer science education, and Online Judging Systems (OJS) play a critical role in automatically assessing SQL codes, improving the accuracy and efficiency of evaluations. However, these systems are vulnerable to manipulation by students who can submit "cheating codes" that pass the…
Descriptors: Programming, Computer Science Education, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Priti Oli; Rabin Banjade; Jeevan Chapagain; Vasile Rus – Grantee Submission, 2024
Assessing students' answers and in particular natural language answers is a crucial challenge in the field of education. Advances in transformer-based models such as Large Language Models (LLMs), have led to significant progress in various natural language tasks. Nevertheless, amidst the growing trend of evaluating LLMs across diverse tasks,…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Artificial Intelligence, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ishaya Gambo; Faith-Jane Abegunde; Omobola Gambo; Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun; Akinbowale Natheniel Babatunde; Cheng-Chi Lee – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
The current educational system relies heavily on manual grading, posing challenges such as delayed feedback and grading inaccuracies. Automated grading tools (AGTs) offer solutions but come with limitations. To address this, "GRAD-AI" is introduced, an advanced AGT that combines automation with teacher involvement for precise grading,…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simon Ntumi – Discover Education, 2025
This study investigated the impact of AI-powered adaptive testing on student academic performance and test anxiety, comparing its effectiveness to traditional testing methods. Using a quantitative research approach, hierarchical regression analysis was employed to examine the influence of adaptive testing on student outcomes, controlling for…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Artificial Intelligence, Test Anxiety
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andreea Dutulescu; Stefan Ruseti; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
Assessing the difficulty of reading comprehension questions is crucial to educational methodologies and language understanding technologies. Traditional methods of assessing question difficulty rely frequently on human judgments or shallow metrics, often failing to accurately capture the intricate cognitive demands of answering a question. This…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Reading Tests, Test Items, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang Zhen; Xiaoyan Zhu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
The pervasive issue of cheating in educational tests has emerged as a paramount concern within the realm of education, prompting scholars to explore diverse methodologies for identifying potential transgressors. While machine learning models have been extensively investigated for this purpose, the untapped potential of TabNet, an intricate deep…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Models, Cheating, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jian Zhao; Elaine Chapman; Peyman G. P. Sabet – Education Research and Perspectives, 2024
The launch of ChatGPT and the rapid proliferation of generative AI (GenAI) have brought transformative changes to education, particularly in the field of assessment. This has prompted a fundamental rethinking of traditional assessment practices, presenting both opportunities and challenges in evaluating student learning. While numerous studies…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jyoti Prakash Meher; Rajib Mall – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2025
Contribution: This article suggests a novel method for diagnosing a learner's cognitive proficiency using deep neural networks (DNNs) based on her answers to a series of questions. The outcome of the forecast can be used for adaptive assistance. Background: Often a learner spends considerable amounts of time in attempting questions on the concepts…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Assistive Technology, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Salvatore G. Garofalo; Stephen J. Farenga – Science & Education, 2025
The purpose of this study was to gauge the attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) use in the science classroom by science teachers at the start of generative AI chatbot popularity (March 2023). The lens of distributed cognition afforded an opportunity to gather thoughts, opinions, and perceptions from 24 secondary science educators as well…
Descriptors: Secondary School Teachers, Science Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tay McEdwards; Greta R. Underhill – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2025
Online learning has steadily increased since well before the COVID-19 pandemic (Seaman et al., 2018), but research has yet to explore online students' perceptions of online exam proctoring methods. The purpose of this exploratory study was to understand the perceptions of fully online students regarding types of proctoring at a large state…
Descriptors: Supervision, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mo Zhang; Paul Deane; Andrew Hoang; Hongwen Guo; Chen Li – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
In this paper, we describe two empirical studies that demonstrate the application and modeling of keystroke logs in writing assessments. We illustrate two different approaches of modeling differences in writing processes: analysis of mean differences in handcrafted theory-driven features and use of large language models to identify stable personal…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Keyboarding (Data Entry), Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Archana Praveen Kumar; Ashalatha Nayak; Manjula Shenoy K.; Chaitanya; Kaustav Ghosh – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are a popular assessment method because they enable automated evaluation, flexible administration and use with huge groups. Despite these benefits, the manual construction of MCQs is challenging, time-consuming and error-prone. This is because each MCQ is comprised of a question called the "stem", a…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction, Test Items, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yusuf Oc; Hela Hassen – Marketing Education Review, 2025
Driven by technological innovations, continuous digital expansion has transformed fundamentally the landscape of modern higher education, leading to discussions about evaluation techniques. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence raises questions about reliability and academic honesty regarding multiple-choice assessments in online…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6