NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tyler M. Moore; Katherine C. Lopez; J. Cobb Scott; Jack C. Lennon; Akira Di Sandro; Eirini Zoupou; Alesandra Gorgone; Monica E. Calkins; Daniel H. Wolf; Joseph W. Kable; Kosha Ruparel; Raquel E. Gur; Ruben C. Gur – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
The Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) is a collection of tests validated using neuroimaging, genetics, and other criteria. An updated version of the CNB was constructed in which all tests were converted to either computerized adaptive (CAT) or abbreviated forms. In a mixed community/clinical sample (N = 307; mean age = 25.9 years;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cognitive Ability, Genetics, Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Markus T. Jansen; Ralf Schulze – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Thurstonian forced-choice modeling is considered to be a powerful new tool to estimate item and person parameters while simultaneously testing the model fit. This assessment approach is associated with the aim of reducing faking and other response tendencies that plague traditional self-report trait assessments. As a result of major recent…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Item Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anne-Mai Meesak; Dmitri Rozgonjuk; Tiia Õun; Eve Kikas – Education 3-13, 2024
Children's development during early childhood affects their well-being and educational success, but there are few reliable assessment instruments available. The aim of the study was to develop, pilot and validate an e-assessment instrument for assessing five-year-old children's development in cognitive processes, learning, language and…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Computer Assisted Testing, Measures (Individuals), Child Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Peter Organisciak; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2024
Creativity is highly valued in both education and the workforce, but assessing and developing creativity can be difficult without psychometrically robust and affordable tools. The open-ended nature of creativity assessments has made them difficult to score, expensive, often imprecise, and therefore impractical for school- or district-wide use. To…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Artificial Intelligence, Measurement Techniques