NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20257
Since 202422
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Reading Ease Formula1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oscar Karnalim; Simon; William Chivers – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: To educate students about programming plagiarism and collusion, we introduced an approach that automatically reports how similar a submitted program is to others. However, as most students receive similar feedback, those who engage in plagiarism and collusion might feel inadequately warned. Objective: When students are…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Plagiarism, Computer Science Education, Programming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sanal Kumar T. S.; R. Thandeeswaran – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a significant increase in the utilization of video-based e-learning platforms for programming education. These platforms never considered the essential attributes of student characteristics and learning preferences while designing such a problematic subject having high dropout and failure rates. The traditional…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Electronic Learning, Higher Education, Programming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ishaya Gambo; Faith-Jane Abegunde; Omobola Gambo; Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun; Akinbowale Natheniel Babatunde; Cheng-Chi Lee – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
The current educational system relies heavily on manual grading, posing challenges such as delayed feedback and grading inaccuracies. Automated grading tools (AGTs) offer solutions but come with limitations. To address this, "GRAD-AI" is introduced, an advanced AGT that combines automation with teacher involvement for precise grading,…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Austin M. Shin; Ayaan M. Kazerouni – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Background and Context: Students' programming projects are often assessed on the basis of their tests as well as their implementations, most commonly using test adequacy criteria like branch coverage, or, in some cases, mutation analysis. As a result, students are implicitly encouraged to use these tools during their development process (i.e., so…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Programming, Student Projects, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marcus Messer; Neil C. C. Brown; Michael Kölling; Miaojing Shi – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
We conducted a systematic literature review on automated grading and feedback tools for programming education. We analysed 121 research papers from 2017 to 2021 inclusive and categorised them based on skills assessed, approach, language paradigm, degree of automation, and evaluation techniques. Most papers assess the correctness of assignments in…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Feedback (Response), Programming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dominic Lohr; Hieke Keuning; Natalie Kiesler – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Feedback as one of the most influential factors for learning has been subject to a great body of research. It plays a key role in the development of educational technology systems and is traditionally rooted in deterministic feedback defined by experts and their experience. However, with the rise of generative AI and especially large…
Descriptors: College Students, Programming, Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gila Hanna; Brendan Larvor; Xiaoheng Kitty Yan – ZDM: Mathematics Education, 2024
In this paper we develop a case for introducing a new teaching tool to undergraduate mathematics. Lean is an interactive theorem prover that instantly checks the correctness of every step and provides immediate feedback. Teaching with Lean might present a challenge, in that students must write their proofs in a formal way using a specific syntax.…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, College Mathematics, Teaching Methods, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erkan Er; Gökhan Akçapinar; Alper Bayazit; Omid Noroozi; Seyyed Kazem Banihashem – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
Despite the growing research interest in the use of large language models for feedback provision, it still remains unknown how students perceive and use AI-generated feedback compared to instructor feedback in authentic settings. To address this gap, this study compared instructor and AI-generated feedback in a Java programming course through an…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Student Attitudes, Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arthur William Fodouop Kouam – Discover Education, 2024
This study investigates the effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) in supporting students with varying levels of programming experience. Through a mixed-methods research design, the study explores the impact of ITS on student performance, adaptability to different skill levels, and best practices for utilizing ITS in heterogeneous…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Instructional Effectiveness, Programming, Skill Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wen-shuang Fu; Jia-hua Zhang; Di Zhang; Tian-tian Li; Min Lan; Na-na Liu – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2025
Cognitive ability is closely associated with the acquisition of programming skills, and enhancing learners' cognitive ability is a crucial factor in improving the efficacy of programming education. Adaptive feedback strategies can provide learners with personalized support based on their learning context, which helps to stimulate their interest…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Cognitive Ability, Programming, Computer Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hongzhi Yang; Chuan Gao; Hui-zhong Shen – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-programmed automated writing evaluation (AWE) has attracted increasing attention in language research. Using a small data set arising from an analysis of five Chinese university-level English as a foreign language (EFL) students' submissions, this paper examined in detail how EFL students interacted with the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Writing Evaluation, Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sirinda Palahan – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2025
The rise of online programming education has necessitated more effective personalized interactions, a gap that PythonPal aims to fill through its innovative learning system integrated with a chatbot. This research delves into PythonPal's potential to enhance the online learning experience, especially in contexts with high student-to-teacher ratios…
Descriptors: Programming, Computer Science Education, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xin Gong; Zhixia Li; Ailing Qiao – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Feedback is crucial during programming problem solving, but context often lacks critical and difference. Generative artificial intelligence dialogic feedback (GenAIDF) has the potential to enhance learners' experience through dialogue, but its effectiveness remains sufficiently underexplored in empirical research. This study employed a rigorous…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Dialogs (Language), Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
David Roldan-Alvarez; Francisco J. Mesa – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) in programming teaching is something that still has to be explored, since in this area assessment tools that allow grading the students work are the most common ones, but there are not many tools aimed toward providing feedback to the students in the process of creating their program. In this work a small sized…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Grading, Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dorottya Demszky; Jing Liu; Heather C. Hill; Dan Jurafsky; Chris Piech – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2024
Providing consistent, individualized feedback to teachers is essential for improving instruction but can be prohibitively resource-intensive in most educational contexts. We develop M-Powering Teachers, an automated tool based on natural language processing to give teachers feedback on their uptake of student contributions, a high-leverage…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Automation, Feedback (Response), Large Group Instruction
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2