NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20254
Since 202413
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hwanggyu Lim; Kyung T. Han – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has gained deserved popularity in the administration of educational and professional assessments, but continues to face test security challenges. To ensure sustained quality assurance and testing integrity, it is imperative to establish and maintain multiple stable item pools that are consistent in terms of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Semere Kiros Bitew; Amir Hadifar; Lucas Sterckx; Johannes Deleu; Chris Develder; Thomas Demeester – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in digital learning systems, as they allow for automating the assessment process. However, owing to the increased digital literacy of students and the advent of social media platforms, MCQ tests are widely shared online, and teachers are continuously challenged to create new questions, which is an…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Construction, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vy Le; Jayson M. Nissen; Xiuxiu Tang; Yuxiao Zhang; Amirreza Mehrabi; Jason W. Morphew; Hua Hua Chang; Ben Van Dusen – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2025
In physics education research, instructors and researchers often use research-based assessments (RBAs) to assess students' skills and knowledge. In this paper, we support the development of a mechanics cognitive diagnostic to test and implement effective and equitable pedagogies for physics instruction. Adaptive assessments using cognitive…
Descriptors: Physics, Science Education, Scientific Concepts, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang Du; Susu Zhang – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2025
Item compromise has long posed challenges in educational measurement, jeopardizing both test validity and test security of continuous tests. Detecting compromised items is therefore crucial to address this concern. The present literature on compromised item detection reveals two notable gaps: First, the majority of existing methods are based upon…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Item Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Markus T. Jansen; Ralf Schulze – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Thurstonian forced-choice modeling is considered to be a powerful new tool to estimate item and person parameters while simultaneously testing the model fit. This assessment approach is associated with the aim of reducing faking and other response tendencies that plague traditional self-report trait assessments. As a result of major recent…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Item Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Achmad Rante Suparman; Eli Rohaeti; Sri Wening – Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 2024
This study focuses on developing a five-tier chemical diagnostic test based on a computer-based test with 11 assessment categories with an assessment score from 0 to 10. A total of 20 items produced were validated by education experts, material experts, measurement experts, and media experts, and an average index of the Aiken test > 0.70 was…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Diagnostic Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Credits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kunal Sareen – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2024
This study examines the proficiency of Chat GPT, an AI language model, in answering questions on the Situational Judgement Test (SJT), a widely used assessment tool for evaluating the fundamental competencies of medical graduates in the UK. A total of 252 SJT questions from the "Oxford Assess and Progress: Situational Judgement" Test…
Descriptors: Ethics, Decision Making, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Marli Crabtree; Kenneth L. Thompson; Ellen M. Robertson – HAPS Educator, 2024
Research has suggested that changing one's answer on multiple-choice examinations is more likely to lead to positive academic outcomes. This study aimed to further understand the relationship between changing answer selections and item attributes, student performance, and time within a population of 158 first-year medical students enrolled in a…
Descriptors: Anatomy, Science Tests, Medical Students, Medical Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Mimi Ismail; Ahmed Al - Badri; Said Al - Senaidi – Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 2025
This study aimed to reveal the differences in individuals' abilities, their standard errors, and the psychometric properties of the test according to the two methods of applying the test (electronic and paper). The descriptive approach was used to achieve the study's objectives. The study sample consisted of 74 male and female students at the…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Psychometrics, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kyeng Gea Lee; Mark J. Lee; Soo Jung Lee – International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 2024
Online assessment is an essential part of online education, and if conducted properly, has been found to effectively gauge student learning. Generally, textbased questions have been the cornerstone of online assessment. Recently, however, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence has added a significant challenge to the integrity of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Biology, Science Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katrin Klingbeil; Fabian Rösken; Bärbel Barzel; Florian Schacht; Kaye Stacey; Vicki Steinle; Daniel Thurm – ZDM: Mathematics Education, 2024
Assessing students' (mis)conceptions is a challenging task for teachers as well as for researchers. While individual assessment, for example through interviews, can provide deep insights into students' thinking, this is very time-consuming and therefore not feasible for whole classes or even larger settings. For those settings, automatically…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Formative Evaluation, Mathematics Tests, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Congning Ni; Bhashithe Abeysinghe; Juanita Hicks – International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2025
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as The Nation's Report Card, offers a window into the state of U.S. K-12 education system. Since 2017, NAEP has transitioned to digital assessments, opening new research opportunities that were previously impossible. Process data tracks students' interactions with the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Multiple Choice Tests, Behavior Change, National Competency Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Susu Zhang; Xueying Tang; Qiwei He; Jingchen Liu; Zhiliang Ying – Grantee Submission, 2024
Computerized assessments and interactive simulation tasks are increasingly popular and afford the collection of process data, i.e., an examinee's sequence of actions (e.g., clickstreams, keystrokes) that arises from interactions with each task. Action sequence data contain rich information on the problem-solving process but are in a nonstandard,…
Descriptors: Correlation, Problem Solving, Computer Assisted Testing, Prediction