Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Descriptor
Automation | 2 |
Data Processing | 2 |
Literature Reviews | 2 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Data Collection | 1 |
Duplication | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Learning Analytics | 1 |
Online Searching | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Andrea Tricco | 1 |
Ashrita Saran | 1 |
Catrin Evans | 1 |
Christina M. Godfrey | 1 |
Daniel Ameen | 1 |
Danielle Pollock | 1 |
Dawid Pieper | 1 |
Erica B. Moraes | 1 |
Hanan Khalil | 1 |
Kamila Misiejuk | 1 |
Lyndsay Alexander | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kamila Misiejuk; Sonsoles López-Pernas; Rogers Kaliisa; Mohammed Saqr – Journal of Learning Analytics, 2025
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has opened new possibilities for designing learning analytics (LA) tools, gaining new insights about student learning processes and their environment, and supporting teachers in assessing and monitoring students. This systematic literature review maps the empirical research of 41 papers utilizing GenAI…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Artificial Intelligence, Learning Analytics, Data Collection
Hanan Khalil; Danielle Pollock; Patricia McInerney; Catrin Evans; Erica B. Moraes; Christina M. Godfrey; Lyndsay Alexander; Andrea Tricco; Micah D. J. Peters; Dawid Pieper; Ashrita Saran; Daniel Ameen; Petek Eylul Taneri; Zachary Munn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Objective: This paper describes several automation tools and software that can be considered during evidence synthesis projects and provides guidance for their integration in the conduct of scoping reviews. Study Design and Setting: The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Software, Synthesis, Protocol Analysis