Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Descriptor
Homework | 3 |
Physics | 3 |
Science Education | 2 |
Academic Failure | 1 |
Active Learning | 1 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Arousal Patterns | 1 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Assignments | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
College Science | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Christian Bokhove | 1 |
John Hansen | 1 |
John Pace | 1 |
John Stewart | 1 |
Neta Shaby | 1 |
R. F. Malenda | 1 |
S. Talbott | 1 |
Scott Walck | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Neta Shaby; Christian Bokhove – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2024
Physiological measures associated with emotional expressions have been used extensively in lab- and, more recently, digital-learning settings. However, the portable and ubiquitous nature of hardware that measures these physiological features makes them particularly useful in situations where you do not want the hardware to be too obtrusive, like…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Emotional Response, Physiology, Psychophysiology
R. F. Malenda; S. Talbott; Scott Walck – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2024
In this article, we discuss Micro Assignment Guided Inquiry and Collaboration (MAGIC), an active learning method that draws on the merits of inquiry-based learning in STEM courses. We describe the use of Micro Assignments (MAs) consisting of a series of short, instructive guiding questions that scaffold the course material. Students work through…
Descriptors: Assignments, Inquiry, Active Learning, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
John Pace; John Hansen; John Stewart – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2024
Machine learning models were constructed to predict student performance in an introductory mechanics class at a large land-grant university in the United States using data from 2061 students. Students were classified as either being at risk of failing the course (earning a D or F) or not at risk (earning an A, B, or C). The models focused on…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Identification, At Risk Students, Physics