Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Open Source Technology | 2 |
| Prediction | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Algorithms | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chunyang Fan | 1 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 1 |
| Dragos-Georgian Corlatescu | 1 |
| François Bouchet | 1 |
| Melina Verger | 1 |
| Micah Watanabe | 1 |
| Mihai Dascalu | 1 |
| Stefan Ruseti | 1 |
| Sébastien Lallé | 1 |
| Vanda Luengo | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textMelina Verger; Chunyang Fan; Sébastien Lallé; François Bouchet; Vanda Luengo – Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2024
Predictive student models are increasingly used in learning environments due to their ability to enhance educational outcomes and support stakeholders in making informed decisions. However, predictive models can be biased and produce unfair outcomes, leading to potential discrimination against certain individuals and harmful long-term…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Prediction, Bias, Classification
Direct linkDragos-Georgian Corlatescu; Micah Watanabe; Stefan Ruseti; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
Modeling reading comprehension processes is a critical task for Learning Analytics, as accurate models of the reading process can be used to match students to texts, identify appropriate interventions, and predict learning outcomes. This paper introduces an improved version of the Automated Model of Comprehension, namely version 4.0. AMoC has its…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Artificial Intelligence, Learning Analytics, Natural Language Processing
