Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Psychological Patterns | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Replication (Evaluation) | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Statistical Significance | 1 |
| Testing | 1 |
| Training | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Research:… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkV. N. Vimal Rao; Jeffrey K. Bye; Sashank Varma – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2024
The 0.05 boundary within Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing (NHST) "has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move" (to quote Douglas Adams). Here, we move past meta-scientific arguments and ask an empirical question: What is the psychological standing of the 0.05 boundary for statistical significance? We…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Statistical Analysis, Testing, Statistical Significance
