NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Richard S. Balkin; Quentin Hunter; Bradley T. Erford – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2024
We describe best practices in reporting reliability estimates in counseling research with consideration to precision, generalization, and diverse populations. We provide a historical context to reporting reliability estimates, the limitations of past practices, and new methods to address reliability generalization. We highlight best practices…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Reliability, Counseling, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Melek Gülsah Sahin; Yildiz Yildirim – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2024
This study aims to generalize the reliability of the GAAIS, which is known to perform valid and reliable measurements, is frequently used in the literature, aims to measure one of today's popular topics, and is one of the first examples developed in the field. Within the meta-analytic reliability generalization study, moderator analyses were also…
Descriptors: Generalization, Meta Analysis, Databases, Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abdulkadir Haktanir; A. Stephen Lenz; M. Furkan Kurnaz – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2024
This study aims to identify the mean alpha coefficients of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) and examine the moderator role of trauma type and study location. We included studies using the CPSS-5 and reporting a Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Our analysis of 27 studies (k = 31) revealed a mean alpha coefficient of 0.91 for the CPSS-5. Mean…
Descriptors: Reliability, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Generalization, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Elif Sari – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2024
Employing G-theory and rater interviews, the study investigated how a high-stakes writing assessment procedure (i.e., a single-task, single-rater, and holistic scoring procedure) impacted the variability and reliability of its scores within the Turkish higher education context. Thirty-two essays written on two different writing tasks (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High Stakes Tests, Writing Evaluation, Scores