Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 11 |
Descriptor
Sample Size | 11 |
Structural Equation Models | 11 |
Error of Measurement | 7 |
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Simulation | 4 |
Bayesian Statistics | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Computation | 3 |
Goodness of Fit | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ben Kelcey | 2 |
Chunhua Cao | 2 |
Fangxing Bai | 2 |
Aaron T. McLaughlin | 1 |
Amota Ataneka | 1 |
Benjamin Lugu | 1 |
Carl Falk | 1 |
Daryl R. Van Tongeren | 1 |
Emma Somer | 1 |
Fei Gu | 1 |
Hanjoe Kim | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 11 |
Journal Articles | 9 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Ismail Cuhadar; Ömür Kaya Kalkan – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Simulation studies are needed to investigate how many score categories are sufficient to treat ordered categorical data as continuous, particularly for bifactor models. The current simulation study aims to address such needs by investigating the performance of estimation methods in the bifactor models with ordered categorical data. Results support…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Structural Equation Models, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Suppanut Sriutaisuk; Yu Liu; Seungwon Chung; Hanjoe Kim; Fei Gu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
The multiple imputation two-stage (MI2S) approach holds promise for evaluating the model fit of structural equation models for ordinal variables with multiply imputed data. However, previous studies only examined the performance of MI2S-based residual-based test statistics. This study extends previous research by examining the performance of two…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement, Programming Languages, Goodness of Fit
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Phillip K. Wood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
The logistic and confined exponential curves are frequently used in studies of growth and learning. These models, which are nonlinear in their parameters, can be estimated using structural equation modeling software. This paper proposes a single combined model, a weighted combination of both models. Mplus, Proc Calis, and lavaan code for the model…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software, Weighted Scores
Chunhua Cao; Benjamin Lugu; Jujia Li – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study examined the false positive (FP) rates and sensitivity of Bayesian fit indices to structural misspecification in Bayesian structural equation modeling. The impact of measurement quality, sample size, model size, the magnitude of misspecified path effect, and the choice or prior on the performance of the fit indices was also…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Measurement, Error of Measurement
Xiaohui Luo; Yueqin Hu – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Intensive longitudinal data has been widely used to examine reciprocal or causal relations between variables. However, these variables may not be temporally aligned. This study examined the consequences and solutions of the problem of temporal misalignment in intensive longitudinal data based on dynamic structural equation models. First the impact…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Causal Models
Emma Somer; Carl Falk; Milica Miocevic – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Factor Score Regression (FSR) is increasingly employed as an alternative to structural equation modeling (SEM) in small samples. Despite its popularity in psychology, the performance of FSR in multigroup models with small samples remains relatively unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the performance of FSR, namely Croon's correction and…
Descriptors: Scores, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis, Sample Size
Fangxing Bai; Ben Kelcey – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
Purpose and Background: Despite the flexibility of multilevel structural equation modeling (MLSEM), a practical limitation many researchers encounter is how to effectively estimate model parameters with typical sample sizes when there are many levels of (potentially disparate) nesting. We develop a method-of-moment corrected maximum likelihood…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Sample Size, Faculty Development
Ben Kelcey; Fangxing Bai; Amota Ataneka; Yanli Xie; Kyle Cox – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
We develop a structural after measurement (SAM) method for structural equation models (SEMs) that accommodates missing data. The results show that the proposed SAM missing data estimator outperforms conventional full information (FI) estimators in terms of convergence, bias, and root-mean-square-error in small-to-moderate samples or large samples…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Research Problems, Error of Measurement, Maximum Likelihood Statistics