NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonathan Hoseana; Andy Leonardo Louismono; Oriza Stepanus – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2025
We describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted…
Descriptors: Graphs, Color, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anna Filighera; Sebastian Ochs; Tim Steuer; Thomas Tregel – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Automatic grading models are valued for the time and effort saved during the instruction of large student bodies. Especially with the increasing digitization of education and interest in large-scale standardized testing, the popularity of automatic grading has risen to the point where commercial solutions are widely available and used. However,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Grading, Form Classes (Languages), Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip Dawson; Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Helen Partridge – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Educators set restrictions in examinations to enable them to assess learning outcomes under particular conditions. The open book versus closed book binary is an example of the sorts of restrictions examiners have traditionally set. In the late 2000s this was expanded to a trinary to include open web examinations. However, the current technology…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaveh Jalilzadeh; Mojgan Rashtchi; Fatemeh Mirzapour – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
A challenging aspect of online education is assessment since academic integrity could be violated due to students' cheating behaviors. The current qualitative research investigated English teachers' perceptions of why students cheat in online assessments. Besides, it attempted to find strategies to reduce cheating in online assessments. Twelve…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Coping, English (Second Language)
New York State Education Department, 2024
The New York State Education Department (NYSED) has a partnership with NWEA for the development of the 2024 Grades 3-8 English Language Arts Tests. Teachers from across the State work with NYSED in a variety of activities to ensure the validity and reliability of the New York State Testing Program (NYSTP). The 2024 Grades 6 and 7 English Language…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Format, Language Arts, English Instruction
New York State Education Department, 2024
The instructions in this manual explain the responsibilities of school administrators for the New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Grades 3-8 English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Grades 5 & 8 Science Tests. School administrators must be thoroughly familiar with the contents of the manual, and the policies and procedures must be followed…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Language Arts, Mathematics Tests, Science Tests