NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202518
Since 202452
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 52 results Save | Export
Yun-Kyung Kim; Li Cai – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2025
This paper introduces an application of cross-classified item response theory (IRT) modeling to an assessment utilizing the embedded standard setting (ESS) method (Lewis & Cook). The cross-classified IRT model is used to treat both item and person effects as random, where the item effects are regressed on the target performance levels (target…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Item Response Theory, Test Items, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patrik Havan; Michal Kohút; Peter Halama – International Journal of Testing, 2025
Acquiescence is the tendency of participants to shift their responses to agreement. Lechner et al. (2019) introduced the following mechanisms of acquiescence: social deference and cognitive processing. We added their interaction into a theoretical framework. The sample consists of 557 participants. We found significant medium strong relationship…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Attention, Difficulty Level, Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Aiman Mohammad Freihat; Omar Saleh Bani Yassin – Educational Process: International Journal, 2025
Background/purpose: This study aimed to reveal the accuracy of estimation of multiple-choice test items parameters following the models of the item-response theory in measurement. Materials/methods: The researchers depended on the measurement accuracy indicators, which express the absolute difference between the estimated and actual values of the…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Computation, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items
Sherwin E. Balbuena – Online Submission, 2024
This study introduces a new chi-square test statistic for testing the equality of response frequencies among distracters in multiple-choice tests. The formula uses the information from the number of correct answers and wrong answers, which becomes the basis of calculating the expected values of response frequencies per distracter. The method was…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Statistics, Test Validity, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tia M. Fechter; Heeyeon Yoon – Language Testing, 2024
This study evaluated the efficacy of two proposed methods in an operational standard-setting study conducted for a high-stakes language proficiency test of the U.S. government. The goal was to seek low-cost modifications to the existing Yes/No Angoff method to increase the validity and reliability of the recommended cut scores using a convergent…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Language Proficiency, Language Tests, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Samah AlKhuzaey; Floriana Grasso; Terry R. Payne; Valentina Tamma – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Designing and constructing pedagogical tests that contain items (i.e. questions) which measure various types of skills for different levels of students equitably is a challenging task. Teachers and item writers alike need to ensure that the quality of assessment materials is consistent, if student evaluations are to be objective and effective.…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Construction, Difficulty Level, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kuan-Yu Jin; Thomas Eckes – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Insufficient effort responding (IER) refers to a lack of effort when answering survey or questionnaire items. Such items typically offer more than two ordered response categories, with Likert-type scales as the most prominent example. The underlying assumption is that the successive categories reflect increasing levels of the latent variable…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Items, Test Wiseness, Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wuji Lin; Chenxi Lv; Jiejie Liao; Yuan Hu; Yutong Liu; Jingyuan Lin – npj Science of Learning, 2024
The debate about whether the capacity of working memory (WM) varies with the complexity of memory items continues. This study employed novel experimental materials to investigate the role of complexity in WM capacity. Across seven experiments, we explored the relationship between complexity and WM capacity. The results indicated that the…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Difficulty Level, Retention (Psychology), Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andreea Dutulescu; Stefan Ruseti; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
Assessing the difficulty of reading comprehension questions is crucial to educational methodologies and language understanding technologies. Traditional methods of assessing question difficulty rely frequently on human judgments or shallow metrics, often failing to accurately capture the intricate cognitive demands of answering a question. This…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Reading Tests, Test Items, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Neda Kianinezhad; Mohsen Kianinezhad – Language Education & Assessment, 2025
This study presents a comparative analysis of classical reliability measures, including Cronbach's alpha, test-retest, and parallel forms reliability, alongside modern psychometric methods such as the Rasch model and Mokken scaling, to evaluate the reliability of C-tests in language proficiency assessment. Utilizing data from 150 participants…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Test Reliability, Language Proficiency, Language Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hojung Kim; Changkyung Song; Jiyoung Kim; Hyeyun Jeong; Jisoo Park – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
This study presents a modified version of the Korean Elicited Imitation (EI) test, designed to resemble natural spoken language, and validates its reliability as a measure of proficiency. The study assesses the correlation between average test scores and Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) levels, examining score distributions among beginner,…
Descriptors: Korean, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Imitation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jerin Kim; Kent McIntosh – Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2025
We aimed to identify empirically valid cut scores on the positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) through an expert panel process known as bookmarking. The TFI is a measurement tool to evaluate the fidelity of implementation of PBIS. In the bookmark method, experts reviewed all TFI items and item scores…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Cutting Scores, Fidelity, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joseph A. Rios; Jiayi Deng – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
To mitigate the potential damaging consequences of rapid guessing (RG), a form of noneffortful responding, researchers have proposed a number of scoring approaches. The present simulation study examines the robustness of the most popular of these approaches, the unidimensional effort-moderated (EM) scoring procedure, to multidimensional RG (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Scoring, Guessing (Tests), Reaction Time, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katrin Schuessler; Vanessa Fischer; Maik Walpuski – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2025
Cognitive load studies are mostly centered on information on perceived cognitive load. Single-item subjective rating scales are the dominant measurement practice to investigate overall cognitive load. Usually, either invested mental effort or perceived task difficulty is used as an overall cognitive load measure. However, the extent to which the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Rating Scales, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aditya Shah; Ajay Devmane; Mehul Ranka; Prathamesh Churi – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Online learning has grown due to the advancement of technology and flexibility. Online examinations measure students' knowledge and skills. Traditional question papers include inconsistent difficulty levels, arbitrary question allocations, and poor grading. The suggested model calibrates question paper difficulty based on student performance to…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Grading, Test Construction
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4