NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 202525
Since 202490
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Head Start1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 90 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ye Ma; Deborah J. Harris – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Item position effect (IPE) refers to situations where an item performs differently when it is administered in different positions on a test. The majority of previous research studies have focused on investigating IPE under linear testing. There is a lack of IPE research under adaptive testing. In addition, the existence of IPE might violate Item…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Sandip Sinharay – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2025
Test-takers, policymakers, teachers, and institutions are increasingly demanding that testing programs provide more detailed feedback regarding test performance. As a result, there has been a growing interest in the reporting of subscores that potentially provide such detailed feedback. Haberman developed a method based on classical test theory…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Theory, Test Items, Testing
Dongmei Li; Shalini Kapoor; Ann Arthur; Chi-Yu Huang; YoungWoo Cho; Chen Qiu; Hongling Wang – ACT Education Corp., 2025
Starting in April 2025, ACT will introduce enhanced forms of the ACT® test for national online testing, with a full rollout to all paper and online test takers in national, state and district, and international test administrations by Spring 2026. ACT introduced major updates by changing the test lengths and testing times, providing more time per…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Testing, Change, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harold Doran; Testsuhiro Yamada; Ted Diaz; Emre Gonulates; Vanessa Culver – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is an increasingly common mode of test administration offering improved test security, better measurement precision, and the potential for shorter testing experiences. This article presents a new item selection algorithm based on a generalized objective function to support multiple types of testing conditions and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lae Lae Shwe; Sureena Matayong; Suntorn Witosurapot – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are an important evaluation technique for both examinations and learning activities. However, the manual creation of questions is time-consuming and challenging for teachers. Hence, there is a notable demand for an Automatic Question Generation (AQG) system. Several systems have been created for this aim, but the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Mark D. Reckase – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In computerized adaptive testing, item exposure control methods are often used to provide a more balanced usage of the item pool. Many of the most popular methods, including the restricted method (Revuelta and Ponsoda), use a single maximum exposure rate to limit the proportion of times that each item is administered. However, Barrada et al.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michael Bass; Scott Morris; Sheng Zhang – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2025
Administration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), using multidimensional computer adaptive tests (MCATs) has the potential to reduce patient burden, but the efficiency of MCAT depends on the degree to which an individual's responses fit the psychometric properties of the assessment. Assessing patients' symptom burden through the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Patients, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hwanggyu Lim; Kyung T. Han – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2024
Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has gained deserved popularity in the administration of educational and professional assessments, but continues to face test security challenges. To ensure sustained quality assurance and testing integrity, it is imperative to establish and maintain multiple stable item pools that are consistent in terms of…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jyun-Hong Chen; Hsiu-Yi Chao – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
To solve the attenuation paradox in computerized adaptive testing (CAT), this study proposes an item selection method, the integer programming approach based on real-time test data (IPRD), to improve test efficiency. The IPRD method turns information regarding the ability distribution of the population from real-time test data into feasible test…
Descriptors: Data Use, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Jing Ma – ProQuest LLC, 2024
This study investigated the impact of scoring polytomous items later on measurement precision, classification accuracy, and test security in mixed-format adaptive testing. Utilizing the shadow test approach, a simulation study was conducted across various test designs, lengths, number and location of polytomous item. Results showed that while…
Descriptors: Scoring, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Classification
Jeff Allen; Jay Thomas; Stacy Dreyer; Scott Johanningmeier; Dana Murano; Ty Cruce; Xin Li; Edgar Sanchez – ACT Education Corp., 2025
This report describes the process of developing and validating the enhanced ACT. The report describes the changes made to the test content and the processes by which these design decisions were implemented. The authors describe how they shared the overall scope of the enhancements, including the initial blueprints, with external expert panels,…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Testing, Change, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jila Niknejad; Margaret Bayer – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2025
In Spring 2020, the need for redesigning online assessments to preserve integrity became a priority to many educators. Many of us found methods to proctor examinations using Zoom and proctoring software. Such examinations pose their own issues. To reduce the technical difficulties and cost, many Zoom proctored examination sessions were shortened;…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefanie A. Wind; Beyza Aksu-Dunya – Applied Measurement in Education, 2024
Careless responding is a pervasive concern in research using affective surveys. Although researchers have considered various methods for identifying careless responses, studies are limited that consider the utility of these methods in the context of computer adaptive testing (CAT) for affective scales. Using a simulation study informed by recent…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Affective Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Musa Adekunle Ayanwale; Mdutshekelwa Ndlovu – Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on high-stakes testing, including the national benchmark tests in South Africa. Current linear testing formats have been criticized for their limitations, leading to a shift towards Computerized Adaptive Testing [CAT]. Assessments with CAT are more precise and take less time. Evaluation of CAT…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Benchmarking, National Competency Tests, Computer Assisted Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6