NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Som Nath Ghimire; Upaj Bhattarai; Raj K. Baral – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
The problem of academic dishonesty in general and exam cheating in particular, has been ubiquitous in schools, colleges, and universities around the world. This paper reports on the findings from teachers' and students' experiences and perceptions of exam cheating at Nepali schools, colleges, and universities. In so doing, the paper highlights the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Foreign Countries, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Weihao Yan; Junjie Peng; Paul L. Harris – Child Development, 2025
This research with two studies examined whether young children's moral judgments of honesty and dishonesty predict their actual cheating behavior. Participants were 200 children aged 3-6 years (2021-2022. Study 1: N = 80, M[subscript age] = 4.96, 40 girls; Study 2: N = 120, M[subscript age] = 4.98, 60 girls; all middle-class Han Chinese). Children…
Descriptors: Moral Values, Decision Making, Cheating, Young Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maite Alguacil; Noemí Herranz-Zarzoso; José C. Pernías; Gerardo Sabater-Grande – Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2024
Cheating in online exams without face-to-face proctoring has been a general concern for academic instructors during the crisis caused by COVID-19. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the cost of these dishonest practices by comparing the academic performance of webcam-proctored students and their unproctored peers in an online gradable test.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Randomized Controlled Trials, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Philip M. Newton; Keioni Essex – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Academic misconduct is a threat to the validity and reliability of online examinations, and media reports suggest that misconduct spiked dramatically in higher education during the emergency shift to online exams caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reviewed survey research to determine how common it is for university students to admit…
Descriptors: Cheating, Tests, Electronic Learning, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip Dawson; Kelli Nicola-Richmond; Helen Partridge – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Educators set restrictions in examinations to enable them to assess learning outcomes under particular conditions. The open book versus closed book binary is an example of the sorts of restrictions examiners have traditionally set. In the late 2000s this was expanded to a trinary to include open web examinations. However, the current technology…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Xinchen Yang; Weihao Yan; Shiqi Ke; Kanza Batool; Yaxin Li; Kang Lee – Studies in Higher Education, 2024
Academic cheating is a pervasive problem in many universities globally. The present double-blind randomized controlled field experiment tested whether reminding university students about academic dishonesty sanction policies would reduce their cheating in an actual exam. Students were assigned to either a Sanction Reminder or a No Reminder…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Discipline Problems, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pritpal Singh Bhullar; Mahesh Joshi; Ritesh Chugh – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT has emerged as a significant subject of research and exploration, casting a critical spotlight on teaching and learning practices in the higher education domain. This study examines the most influential articles, leading journals, and productive countries concerning citations and publications related to ChatGPT in higher education, while…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Synchronous Communication, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patrik Holm; Ulrik Terp; Christina Fjaeraa Alfredsson – Discover Education, 2025
Academic dishonesty is a growing problem in higher education. This study examines students' attitudes toward cheating. The sample consisted of 318 students enrolled in health science courses at a Swedish university. A survey-based quantitative approach was employed, integrating qualitative responses from open-ended questions. We investigated…
Descriptors: Cheating, Student Attitudes, College Students, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jill Oeding; Theresa Gunn; Aleisha Jones – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2024
This quantitative study is designed to determine the impact of online proctoring software in graduate courses. The researchers compared the final grades of two groups of online graduate students who were taught by professors who had online exams before and after the university implemented proctoring software. Essentially the only difference…
Descriptors: Supervision, Electronic Learning, Computer Software, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rajlaxmi Chouhan – Learning: Research and Practice, 2024
This paper presents simple and intuitive strategies for effective online assessment of a freshman engineering course. The proposed strategies for unproctored online exams include creating multiple sets with identical options, using image-format questions, maintaining short duration of exam, and employing a rotational assignment. Unlike a…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Tests, Electronic Learning, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Daniel Woldeab; Thomas Brothen – International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 2024
In this study, we analyze undergraduate student responses in 1,364 surveys to better understand student reactions to online proctoring. We present findings regarding two aspects of student reactions to online proctoring: First, we assess whether students believe that the act of cheating in online exams diminishes the legitimacy of their courses;…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Online Courses, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ebenezer Afrifa-Yamoah; Esther Adama; Amanda Graf; Kwadwo Adusei-Asante – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2024
COVID-19 has revolutionised assessment design and practices in higher education; however, there has been no shift in the objective of enhancing the relationship between assessment and learning that promote the holistic development of students. In this study, we provide an empirical evaluation of the perceived effects of assessment practices…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Educational Practices, Undergraduate Students, Foreign Countries