NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Galina Shulgina; Jamie Costley; Irina Shcheglova; Han Zhang; Natalya Sedova – Smart Learning Environments, 2024
While peer-editing is considered an important part of developing students' academic writing, questions remain about how different types of peer-editing affect subsequent student performance. The present study looked at a group of university students (N = 149) engaged in peer editing of one another's essays in an online security studies course. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Editing, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xiao Dong; Betty Anne Younker – Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 2025
Research into using AI for editing doctoral dissertation work in music education and a subsequent review of literature prompted this collaborative investigation. Specifically, this paper examines ChatGPT-Human collaboration in doctoral dissertation writing and editing through the lens of Martin Buber's (1958) "I-Thou" relation.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Doctoral Dissertations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jamie Costley; Han Zhang; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Matthew Baldwin; Mik Fanguy – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2025
While the use of collaborative peer editing is widespread in some online learning contexts, little is known about how constituent editing behaviours impact student writing quality when using shared online documents as the mediating tool. Therefore, the present study (n = 176) examines the effects of English language learners' peer editing…
Descriptors: Editing, Peer Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ralf Giessler – Language Awareness, 2024
This paper reports on a pilot study with advanced EFL learners in Germany who were asked to use ProWritingAid (PWA) for a composition task in a German comprehensive school. PWA is an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool that provides writers with feedback on grammar, spelling mistakes, and writing style during the writing and editing process.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Foreign Countries, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koji Osawa – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
With the recent rapid technological advance, second language (L2) educators have increasingly incorporated technologies into writing pedagogy. Two of the major technologies to promote L2 writing are e-portfolios and automated written corrective feedback (AWCF). Notably, feedback-rich portfolios facilitate L2 learners' self-regulation and writing…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation