Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Conferences (Gatherings) | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Medical Education | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| Physicians | 1 |
| Professional Continuing… | 1 |
| Risk | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Continuing… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAllen, Michael; MacLeod, Tanya; Handfield-Jones, Richard; Sinclair, Douglas; Fleming, Michael – Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2010
Introduction: Clinical trial data can be presented in ways that exaggerate treatment effectiveness. Physicians consider therapy more effective, and may be more likely to make inappropriate practice changes, when data are presented in relative terms such as relative risk reduction rather than in absolute terms such as absolute risk reduction and…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Professional Continuing Education, Teaching Methods, Visual Aids
