Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
English Language Teaching | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Journal of Response to Writing | 1 |
National Institute for… | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Author
Daniel F. McCaffrey | 2 |
Jessica Nastal | 2 |
Jill Burstein | 2 |
Lynette Hazelton | 2 |
Norbert Elliot | 2 |
LaGuerre, Joselle L. | 1 |
Lei, Jiun-Iung | 1 |
Liaw, Meei-Ling | 1 |
Warschauer, Mark | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 5 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Two Year Colleges | 3 |
Adult Basic Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Illinois | 2 |
Pennsylvania | 2 |
Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lynette Hazelton; Jessica Nastal; Norbert Elliot; Jill Burstein; Daniel F. McCaffrey – Journal of Response to Writing, 2021
In writing studies research, automated writing evaluation technology is typically examined for a specific, often narrow purpose: to evaluate a particular writing improvement measure, to mine data for changes in writing performance, or to demonstrate the effectiveness of a single technology and accompanying validity arguments. This article adopts a…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Automation, Natural Language Processing
Lynette Hazelton; Jessica Nastal; Norbert Elliot; Jill Burstein; Daniel F. McCaffrey – Grantee Submission, 2021
In writing studies research, automated writing evaluation technology is typically examined for a specific, often narrow purpose: to evaluate a particular writing improvement measure, to mine data for changes in writing performance, or to demonstrate the effectiveness of a single technology and accompanying validity arguments. This article adopts a…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Automation, Natural Language Processing
Lei, Jiun-Iung – English Language Teaching, 2020
While Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) can perform an error diagnosis (Chen & Cheng, 2008), previous studies used to exclude it from the process of error analysis. This study aimed to examine the reactions of Grammarly Premium towards a group of night school students' English writings at a Taiwanese technical university. The participants of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Error Analysis (Language), Second Language Learning
LaGuerre, Joselle L. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Generally, this descriptive study endeavored to include the voice of adult learners to the scholarly body of research regarding automated writing assessment tools (AWATs). Specifically, the study sought to determine the extent to which students perceive that the AWAT named Criterion fosters learning and if students' opinions differ depending on…
Descriptors: Adult Students, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Automation
Warschauer, Mark; Liaw, Meei-Ling – National Institute for Literacy, 2010
Although information and communication technologies have become an integral part of life in the United States, they have not yet been adequately integrated into adult language and literacy programs. This raises concerns because of the potential value of technology for enhancing learning and because of the vital role of technological proficiency as…
Descriptors: Technological Advancement, Information Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Adult Literacy