Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Generalizability Theory | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Writing Tests | 2 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ben-Simon, Anat | 1 |
| Bennett, Randy Elliott | 1 |
| Chen, Dandan | 1 |
| Hebert, Michael | 1 |
| Sandbank, Micheal P. | 1 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWilson, Joshua; Chen, Dandan; Sandbank, Micheal P.; Hebert, Michael – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2019
The present study examined issues pertaining to the reliability of writing assessment in the elementary grades, and among samples of struggling and nonstruggling writers. The present study also extended nascent research on the reliability and the practical applications of automated essay scoring (AES) systems in Response to Intervention frameworks…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Scores, Writing Tests
Download full textBen-Simon, Anat; Bennett, Randy Elliott – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
This study evaluated a "substantively driven" method for scoring NAEP writing assessments automatically. The study used variations of an existing commercial program, e-rater[R], to compare the performance of three approaches to automated essay scoring: a "brute-empirical" approach in which variables are selected and weighted solely according to…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays
