Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Computer Software | 6 |
Evaluators | 6 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Artificial Intelligence | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Interrater Reliability | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Education Next | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
International Educational… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Education Policy | 1 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
Author
Fisher-Ari, Teresa | 1 |
Gal, Kobi | 1 |
Kavanagh, Kara M. | 1 |
Kevin C. Haudek | 1 |
Khorramdel, Lale | 1 |
Kovalkov, Anastasia | 1 |
Martin, Anne | 1 |
Olsen, Robert B. | 1 |
Oppenheimer, Todd | 1 |
Paassen, Benjamin | 1 |
Pinkwart, Niels | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kevin C. Haudek; Xiaoming Zhai – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Argumentation, a key scientific practice presented in the "Framework for K-12 Science Education," requires students to construct and critique arguments, but timely evaluation of arguments in large-scale classrooms is challenging. Recent work has shown the potential of automated scoring systems for open response assessments, leveraging…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Persuasive Discourse, Artificial Intelligence, Learning Management Systems
Tipton, Elizabeth; Olsen, Robert B. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2022
This guide will help researchers design and implement impact studies in education so that the findings are more generalizable to the study's target population. Guidance is provided on key steps that researchers can take, including defining the target population, selecting a sample of schools--and replacement schools, when needed--managing school…
Descriptors: Outcome Measures, Evaluators, Educational Researchers, Educational Research
von Davier, Matthias; Tyack, Lillian; Khorramdel, Lale – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Automated scoring of free drawings or images as responses has yet to be used in large-scale assessments of student achievement. In this study, we propose artificial neural networks to classify these types of graphical responses from a TIMSS 2019 item. We are comparing classification accuracy of convolutional and feed-forward approaches. Our…
Descriptors: Scoring, Networks, Artificial Intelligence, Elementary Secondary Education
Kovalkov, Anastasia; Paassen, Benjamin; Segal, Avi; Gal, Kobi; Pinkwart, Niels – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2021
Promoting creativity is considered an important goal of education, but creativity is notoriously hard to define and measure. In this paper, we make the journey from defining a formal creativity and applying the measure in a practical domain. The measure relies on core theoretical concepts in creativity theory, namely fluency, flexibility, and…
Descriptors: Creativity, Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluators, Specialists
Fisher-Ari, Teresa; Kavanagh, Kara M.; Martin, Anne – Journal of Education Policy, 2017
Neoliberal discourses defining and measuring "student achievement" and "teacher success" through myopic high-stakes testing-driven criteria for "accountability," can perpetuate the very inequities these reforms purport to address. Nested within a five-year inquiry using grounded theory to investigate experiences of…
Descriptors: Neoliberalism, Grounded Theory, Academic Achievement, Cheating
Oppenheimer, Todd – Education Next, 2007
Educational software makers are often rebuffed by educational authorities, whose endorsements could lead to governmental stamps of approval, and thus explosive sales. But they usually get warmer receptions in the offices of the nation's school superintendents, who are, after all, their primary customers. The system was not supposed to work this…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Vendors, Instructional Materials, Computer Software