Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Incidental Learning | 3 |
Learning Processes | 3 |
Spatial Ability | 2 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Age Groups | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Cognitive Structures | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Discourse Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Battersby, Sarah E. | 1 |
Golledge, Reginald G. | 1 |
Karatekin, Canan | 1 |
Marcus, David J. | 1 |
Marsh, Meredith J. | 1 |
Taylor, Edd V. | 1 |
White, Tonya | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Taylor, Edd V. – Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2012
This study describes the Reflection Connection Cycle professional development designed to support teachers' use and appreciation of students' out-of-school practices related to school mathematics. The year-long program incorporated group lesson design, readings, and video analysis for 14 elementary school (ages 5-12) teachers. Analysis of lesson…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Mathematics Education, Program Descriptions, Elementary School Teachers
Karatekin, Canan; Marcus, David J.; White, Tonya – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007
The goal of this study was to examine incidental and intentional spatial sequence learning during middle childhood and adolescence. We tested four age groups (8-10 years, 11-13 years, 14-17 years, and young adults [18+ years]) on a serial reaction time task and used manual and oculomotor measures to examine incidental sequence learning.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Intentional Learning, Incidental Learning, Children
Battersby, Sarah E.; Golledge, Reginald G.; Marsh, Meredith J. – Journal of Geography, 2006
In this paper, the authors evaluate map overlay, a concept central to geospatial thinking, to determine how it is naively and technically understood, as well as to identify when it is leaner innately. The evaluation is supported by results from studies at three grade levels to show the progression of incidentally learned geospatial knowledge as…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Geography Instruction, Learning Processes