Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Disabilities | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Fidelity | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Exceptional Children | 1 |
Author
| Al Otaiba, Stephanie | 1 |
| Connor, Carol M. | 1 |
| Folsom, Jessica S. | 1 |
| Greulich, Luana | 1 |
| Schatschneider, Christopher | 1 |
| Wagner, Richard K. | 1 |
| Wanzek, Jeanne | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAl Otaiba, Stephanie; Connor, Carol M.; Folsom, Jessica S.; Wanzek, Jeanne; Greulich, Luana; Schatschneider, Christopher; Wagner, Richard K. – Exceptional Children, 2014
This randomized controlled experiment compared the efficacy of two response-to-intervention (RTI) models--typical RTI and dynamic RTI--and included 34 first-grade classrooms (n = 522 students) across 10 socioeconomically and culturally diverse schools. Typical RTI was designed to follow the two-stage RTI decision rules that wait to assess response…
Descriptors: Intervention, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Experimental Groups
